Two-fermion system wave function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the wave function of a two-fermion system, specifically two electrons in an atom. It clarifies that the overall wave function can be represented as either a symmetric spatial function combined with an antisymmetric spin function or vice versa. The distinction arises when considering superpositions of energy levels; if the electrons occupy fixed energy levels, only one of the two forms (a or b) applies. In cases where electrons have different quantum numbers, the antisymmetric spatial wave function is generally preferred, although both forms are valid depending on the specific circumstances of the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly fermions and wave functions.
  • Familiarity with the Pauli exclusion principle and its implications for electron configurations.
  • Knowledge of quantum states and superposition in quantum systems.
  • Basic comprehension of Rabi oscillations and their effects on energy levels.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Pauli exclusion principle on multi-electron systems.
  • Research the Hund's rules and their application in determining electron configurations.
  • Explore the concept of superposition in quantum mechanics and its effects on wave functions.
  • Investigate Rabi oscillations and their role in quantum state transitions.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers focusing on atomic and molecular systems, particularly those studying electron interactions and wave function behavior in fermionic systems.

PhyPsy
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
For a two-electron atom, this book says that the overall wave function is either a) the symmetric space function times the antisymmetric spin function or b) the antisymmetric space function times the symmetric spin function. However, in another problem which involves two fermions in a harmonic oscillator, it says the overall wave function is a sum of the two aforementioned products (a + b). Why would the atom's wave function not be a + b instead of being just a or b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your two-electron atom does not have a superposition of different energy levels for the electrons (something you have to carefully prepare), the spins are fixed and antisymmetric OR symmetric, but not both, and the same is true for the spatial component. If you have superpositions of different energy levels, you might get something like "a+b".
 
For the first excited state of the atom, one electron is in the lowest energy level n=1, and the other is in the level n=2. According to your statement, there should be a superposition, but the answer only contains a b (from my initial post) term and no a term.
 
PhyPsy said:
For the first excited state of the atom, one electron is in the lowest energy level n=1, and the other is in the level n=2.
If you fix the energy levels like this, you do not have a superposition of different energy states.

What I meant is something like Rabi oscillations, where the electrons are not in specific energy levels (at least not all the time).
 
OK, so then for systems that are not a superposition, how do you know whether to use a or b? I understand that for atoms where both electrons have the same value for n, the antisymmetric space function is equal to 0, so you have to pick a, but what about atoms where the electrons have different values for n? Is it always b for atoms with electrons that have different values for n?
 
In the case of electrons, usually the antisymmetric spatial wave function is preferrable, since this leads to a larger mean separation of the electrons (look up the Hund rules).

But both are valid wave functions, and which one is preferable depends on the circumstances. For example, most molecules have singlet ground states, but then there is oxygen2, which does not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K