Two slit experiment w baseballs

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of conducting a two-slit experiment using baseballs. Participants conclude that while it may be theoretically possible, practical challenges render it unfeasible. The primary obstacle is the requirement to prevent which-path information from being available, as baseballs emit light and heat, making isolation nearly impossible. The largest object successfully diffracted to demonstrate interference is C60 (buckminsterfullerene), highlighting the limitations of using macroscopic objects like baseballs in quantum experiments.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the two-slit experiment
  • Knowledge of diffraction and interference patterns
  • Concept of which-path information in quantum physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of which-path information in quantum experiments
  • Explore the properties and applications of C60 (buckminsterfullerene) in quantum physics
  • Investigate methods for achieving isolation in quantum experiments
  • Learn about macroscopic quantum phenomena and their limitations
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, quantum mechanics researchers, and anyone interested in the practical applications of quantum theory in macroscopic objects.

Ronmarc
Would it be theoretically possible to perform a two slit experiment with, say, baseballs? How would such an experiment need be set up?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phinds said:
No, not really. Baseballs are not quantum objects. THEORETICALLY, it is perhaps not literally impossible but I don't believe that in practice that it is possible.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/buckyball-double-slit-experiment.487816/
Thank you. But in the link you provided, someone states that the two slit experiment could be performed on asteroids "in perfect isolation". I'm confused.
 
Ronmarc said:
Thank you. But in the link you provided, someone states that the two slit experiment could be performed on asteroids "in perfect isolation". I'm confused.

:welcome:

About the largest object that has been diffracted to show interference is C60 (buckminsterfullerene):

http://www.univie.ac.at/qfp/research/matterwave/c60/index.html

Keep in mind that to show the interference, you cannot know which-path information. That is why the comment was made about being in isolation. Clearly, that alone would be a severe challenge with baseballs that emit light/heat. That would tell you, at least in principle, which path the object took.
 
Ronmarc said:
Thank you. But in the link you provided, someone states that the two slit experiment could be performed on asteroids "in perfect isolation". I'm confused.
I don't see any conflict with that statement and my statement. As DrChinese pointed out, the practical aspects of keeping baseballs "in perfect isolation" are pretty much insurmountable. Just because math says that something is theoretically possible does NOT mean that it can be made to happen in the real world.
 
You could do it if you could prevent any knowledge of which slit they passed through from being available in the knowable universe. If you think about it, it would be very difficult for nothing anywhere to notice baseballs en route through baseball size slits.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
464
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K