U.S. saves France from itself (again, and again, and again)

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter EnumaElish
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the financial implications of a significant loss incurred by a junior trader at Societe Generale, which some participants speculate may have triggered broader market reactions, including a U.S. Federal Reserve interest rate cut. The conversation touches on themes of market dynamics, risk management, and the interconnectedness of financial institutions, with references to historical precedents and comparisons to other financial crises.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that the $7 billion loss at Societe Generale could have been catastrophic for the financial markets, potentially likening it to a "Chernobyl disaster" had the Fed not intervened.
  • Others argue that the losses reported by other banks, such as Merrill Lynch and Citi, are also significant and should not be overlooked in the context of the current financial turmoil.
  • A participant draws a parallel to the Nick Leeson incident, questioning how a junior trader could hide such a large position and suggesting systemic issues within the bank.
  • Some express skepticism about the idea that the Fed's actions were solely to assist the French bank, pointing out the broader context of market instability and the role of panic-selling.
  • There is a discussion about the mechanics of futures contracts and how the timing of selling positions could affect market outcomes, with some questioning whether a staggered approach might have mitigated the impact.
  • A participant inquires about who benefited from the trader's losses, leading to an explanation of how futures contracts work and who might profit in such scenarios.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the implications of the Societe Generale incident or the role of the U.S. Federal Reserve. Some agree on the exceptional nature of the loss, while others dispute the framing of the event as primarily a French issue, highlighting the complexity of the financial landscape.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the lack of clarity regarding the systemic implications of the loss and the interconnectedness of various financial institutions. There are also unresolved questions about the specific mechanics of futures trading and the potential for market reactions to be influenced by factors beyond the Societe Generale incident.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying financial markets, risk management, and the effects of large-scale trading losses on market stability, as well as individuals interested in the historical context of financial crises.

  • #31
mgb_phys said:
Now that you don't like France anymore

I don't understand what's with this "disliking countries". Personnaly I consider Bush's moron, however I don't think I've been saying stuff like "Americans are like this or that" or "I dislike the USA" or whatever (yet many people, and not just in France, don't bother with their brain and openly bash the Americans all day long and vice versa). Seriously people, these flame wars are so "bourgeoises" (grammar pedantic: bourgeois is accorded in gender and number and the French word for war has a feminine gender).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
russ_watters said:
Just for the record, when was the last time France saved the US?

I think Anttech is referring to the title of this thread.
 
  • #33
russ_watters said:
Just for the record, when was the last time France saved the US?

Hum, it didn't work, but when they tried to persuade you not to go into Irak ? :smile: couldn't resist...
 
  • #34
This Societe Generale's thing is of course the big headlines here in France, and nobody is really understanding a lot, but the financial part of the federal police is of course looking into it.

There are in fact two contradictory theses:

-according to the Soc. Gen. management, a week ago or something they FINALLY discovered one of their traders who had broken into the computer system of their control organs to dissimulate his actions (formerly, he was one of the designers of that security system apparently) and to give himself totally free lattitude. Apparently he has been doing this for months or even a year, and totalled positions for about 50 billion Euros (which he was never supposed to gamble but which he had dissimulated from the control systems). When management discovered this, they followed STANDARD PROCEDURE in their company, which is to sell IMMEDIATELY all the "fraudulent" (that is, outside of their authorised rules) positions, which... engendered 5 billion Euros of losses (or about 10%).

- according to many experts, this story is not possible unless we have James Bond or Randi in front of us, and this means that this company had accumulated knowledgingly 5 billion of losses, and were looking for a way to dissimulate this, and invented this story of the lone and fraudulent trader. They think it is unthinkable that management wasn't actively or passively endorsing his actions.

Apparently, police interviews with the trader seem to show that the first story is nevertheless correct, although the guy denies having acted fraudulently: HIS SAME TECHNIQUES allowed him to gain about 1.5 billion Euros two years ago, and he was, at that time, *congratulated* by management. Aparently, he set out to become "the best trader of all times"... his ambition was not to be fraudulent, but to show how good he was... (got this on the radio this morning).

Now, the funny thing is that Soc. Gen. did even announce modest gains this year. They were hoping in fact for about 5 billion Euros of gains, and ended up with the meager gain of a few hundreds of millions, after their covering of the losses caused by this affair.
 
  • #35
vanesch said:
Hum, it didn't work, but when they tried to persuade you not to go into Irak ? :smile: couldn't resist...

Heh, we even started calling French Fries, Freedom Fries, in protest of your lack of support for the invasion.

Yipper shipper, that'll show em! dur de dur :biggrin:
 
  • #36
Aparently, he set out to become "the best trader of all times"... his ambition was not to be fraudulent, but to show how good he was... (got this on the radio this morning).
You work in a bank, you make a loss on a trade, you have a choice
1, Tell your manager, lose bonus/get fired
2, Hide the loss by making twice as big a bet tomorrow. Repeat until you win.

Method 2 seems to be pretty common in banks. All the banks have systems to prevent it, but since the banks are in favour of (2) so long as you win the systems aren't very effective.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K