Prove Uncertainity Relation for Particle in a Box w/ Length L

  • Thread starter Thread starter string_theory
  • Start date Start date
string_theory
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi dear virtual friends,

I am now going to ask you something. I would be pleased if you would answer me.

In an exam I was asked to show that for a particle in a box of width length L , delta (x)delta(p)>=h/(4*pi) holds.
I think this is not a logical question. Because I think it is like asking something like this: Prove A using A.

I would be really grateful if you would write something regarding this.
Thank you.

P.S. My problem is not envolving you in doing my homework. I just wanted to know if what I think is right or wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think you were supposed to calculate Δx and Δp separately, then multiply the two together, and compare it to h/4pi.

you know, find the expectation value of x, and then the expectation value of x2 and all that jazz.

of course you are not allowed to use the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle to show that the Heisenberg Uncertainty principle is true. that is circular.
 
Thank you very much for youranswer.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top