Uncertainty in Energy-Time Relation for Atomic Transitions

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenD420
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Uncertainty
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the energy-time uncertainty relation in the context of atomic transitions, specifically examining the relationship between energy, momentum, and wavelength of emitted photons during such transitions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the derivation of the uncertainty relation ΔEΔt = hbar, questioning the use of various physical identities and relationships between energy, momentum, and wavelength.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide hints and guidance on manipulating equations, while others express uncertainty about specific steps in the derivation. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the relevance of certain equations and concepts, such as the RMS values and the relationship E=pc.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through complex relationships and identities in quantum mechanics, with some expressing confusion about the application of certain principles and the implications of relativistic effects on the problem at hand.

StephenD420
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
If an atom transitions from an initially excited state emitting a photon E=hf and going to the ground state, and since ΔxΔk=1 show that ΔEΔt = hbar.

So I know Ephoton=hf=hbar*sqrt(k/m) = hbar * sqrt(1/Δx*m)
and since E=pc and p=hbar*k=hbar/Δx

but I am not sure what to do from here?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Stephen
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i'll give you a few clues:

[tex]k = \frac{2 \pi}{\lambda}[/tex]
[tex]c = f \lambda[/tex]
 
ok so...
E = pc=hbar*kc=hbar*2pi/λ*fλ=hf=Ephoton
if E= hf=pc=hbar*sqrt(k/m)
hbar^2/(4pi^2) = p^2*c^2*m/k
and since ΔxΔy=1
so h=p^2*c^2*m*Δx=E*p^2*Δx
so would this lead to h=ΔE*p^2*Δx
or ΔE*Δt=h
and the uncertainty principle for RMS values be ΔEΔt=h/4pi

I am not sure what to do to get the answer from here.
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks.
Stephen
 
bump...please any help
 
I think you are just over complicating the problem, don't use E=pc (is that even true?). Just use the identities I gave you and rearrange ΔxΔk=1 into ΔEΔt = hbar.
 
How? I am not seeing it. Would you show me the first couple of steps...

Thanks.
Stephen
 
okay, how about:

since [itex]k = \frac{2 \pi }{\lambda}[/itex] and [itex]c = f \lambda[/itex]
then [itex]k = \frac{2 \pi f}{c}[/itex]

all of those are constants except for f, therefore

[tex]Δk = \frac{2 \pi}{c} Δf[/tex]
 
ok so
k=2*pi/λ and c=f*λ and k=2*pi*f/c
so Δk= 2*pi*Δf/c
since ΔxΔk=1
1=2*pi/c * ΔxΔf
h=2*pi/c *Δx*h*Δf
hbar=ΔEΔt

and since the RMS value would be the average so 1/2*the uncertainty value so h/4*pi = ΔEΔt

is this it?

Thanks for the help.
Stephen
 
i don't see what RMS has to do with this question? hbar is your uncertainty (or the product of two uncertainties...)
 
  • #10
ok am I right on the preceding work?
 
  • #11
looks good, just make sure you understand every step
 
  • #13
also stated on the site that it is an approximation for extreme relativistic velocities
 
  • #14
which is needed for a photon which is why Ephoton=pc
 
  • #15
ah right, sorry
 
  • #16
no problem at all and thanks so much for the help...I am really just repeating what my prof said as I am trying to understand all this..

Thanks again.
Stephen
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K