Uncovering the Truth: Jupiter's Core Revealed as Solid Diamond by Tammy Ma

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter KevinMcHugh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core Diamond Jupiter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the claim made by Tammy Ma that Jupiter's core is solid diamond, as reported in a Scientific American article. Participants explore the implications of this claim, its scientific validity, and the context within which it has been presented, including references to related literature and the potential for further investigation.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the claim, noting a lack of published evidence supporting it beyond the author's assertions.
  • Others point out that the idea of a diamond core has been previously considered in literature, including speculative fiction, but question its scientific grounding.
  • There is mention of the need for original peer-reviewed sources rather than popular interpretations to assess the validity of the claim.
  • One participant raises a question about how a diamond core model would align with gravity harmonics data from NASA's Juno mission, suggesting that existing models may not support the idea of a solid core.
  • Another participant speculates that gravity could deform a solid core over long distances, indicating a potential complexity in the model.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the validity of the diamond core claim. Multiple competing views remain, with some acknowledging the possibility of the idea while others express skepticism about its acceptance in the scientific community.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted absence of new published evidence regarding the diamond core claim, and participants highlight the importance of distinguishing between speculative ideas and established scientific findings.

KevinMcHugh
Messages
32
Reaction score
10
TL;DR
Title says it all.
In a recent Scientific American article, Tammy Ma claims Jupiters core is solid diamond. She claims her work with lasers has demonstrated this. Any thoughts?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
KevinMcHugh said:
In a recent Scientific American article, Tammy Ma claims Jupiters core is solid diamond. She claims her work with lasers has demonstrated this. Any thoughts?
My though is that when you ask about an article, you should post a link to the article.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dragrath, DaveE, berkeman and 1 other person
How do I do that, I'm an old fossil.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hagopbul
KevinMcHugh said:
How do I do that, I'm an old fossil.
Go to the web page where you read this. Click-Drag to copy the address (starts with "http://" or similar) in the address bar of your browser, and paste it into a reply here.

Also, it's best if you can find where in the article they link to the original peer-reviewed article, please also post a copy of that link here. We prefer to read the original paper, rather than the popoular press' interpretation of the scientific paper. Thanks. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dragrath, Bystander, phinds and 1 other person
I read the same idea (diamond core of a gas giant) in a some Arthur C. Clarke book may years ago.
Doesn't make it science though.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KevinMcHugh
BillTre said:
I read the same idea (diamond core of a gas giant) in a some Arthur C. Clarke book may years ago.
Doesn't make it science though.
Note, Tammy Ma is a reputable scientist, and the diamond core idea has been considered a possibility worth investigating by many in the field. But what I couldn’t find is any sign of new published evidence, nor of any general acceptance of the idea as anything more than a possibility.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: KevinMcHugh, phinds and BillTre
PAllen said:
Note, Tammy Ma is a reputable scientist, and the diamond core idea has been considered a possibility worth investigating by many in the field. But what I couldn’t find is any sign of new published evidence, nor of any general acceptance of the idea as anything more than a possibility.
How would a "diamond core" model reconcile with the measured gravity harmonics determined by NASA's Juno mission? As far as I can tell those models preclude a pure solid core as presumably needed for a crystalline latice.
 
  • #10
Dragrath said:
How would a "diamond core" model reconcile with the measured gravity harmonics determined by NASA's Juno mission? As far as I can tell those models preclude a pure solid core as presumably needed for a crystalline latice.
This is not a field I know much about. I just did some internet searching because it seemed the OP wasn't going to. I found that the diamond core idea appeared to be taken seriously as a 'possibility' by many in the field, however I cannot speak to the specifics of your question.
 
  • #11
I would expect that gravity is sufficient to deform even a solid core over long distances, just like everywhere else.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K