I Understanding Admit & Adapt: Timelike Killing Vector Field

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter GR191511
  • Start date Start date
GR191511
Messages
76
Reaction score
6
"A space-time is said to be stationary if and only if it admits a timelike Killing vector field"
"...given a a timelike Killing vector field,then there always exists a coordinate system which is adapted to the Killing vector field##X^a##,that is,in which##X^a=\delta^a_0##holds..."
How to understand "admit"and"adapt"?Does it mean that ##X^a=\delta^a_0## may not hold even if there exists a timelike Killing vector field?Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Admits, in this context, is a fancy way of saying "has". Stationary spacetimes are those that have a timelike Killing vector field.

"Adapted to" means "well matched to". You can always pick a coordinate system with a timelike basis parallel to the Killing field. It's often a good idea because then your definition of space can be independent of time, and Schwarzschild coordinates are an example of this. But as always with coordinates you are free to make any choice you like. In Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates, for example, the integral curves of the Killing vector field form hyperbolas. You don't even have to have a timelike basis vector if you don't want to.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes topsquark, vanhees71, Nugatory and 1 other person
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top