Understanding Archimedes' Principle: Solving for Density in a Buoyancy Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a buoyancy problem involving Archimedes' Principle, where an object has a normal weight of 500 N and an apparent weight of 300 N when submerged in water. Participants are exploring how to calculate the density of the object based on these weights.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to set up equations based on Archimedes' Principle but are questioning their algebraic manipulation of the densities involved. There is confusion about the relationship between apparent weight and the densities of the object and fluid.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the definitions and implications of apparent weight and buoyancy, suggesting that the original poster may be misunderstanding how to apply Archimedes' Principle correctly. There is ongoing exploration of whether the problem can be solved algebraically and what assumptions may be leading to confusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are discussing the implications of apparent weight and the conditions under which an object is neutrally buoyant. There are references to the definitions of density and the setup of the problem, indicating potential gaps in understanding the principles at play.

brake4country
Messages
216
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement


If an object is 500 N normally but has an apparent weight of 300 N when submerged in water, what is the density of the object?

Homework Equations


ρobjVobjg = ρfluidVobjg

The Attempt at a Solution


So the correct answer is 2500 kg/m3 but when I set up the problem, it doesn't turn out correct.
ρobjVobjg = ρfluidVobjg
Both volumes and gravity cancel resulting with:
ρfluidobj
Is there an error in my set up? Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
brake4country said:

Homework Statement


If an object is 500 N normally but has an apparent weight of 300 N when submerged in water, what is the density of the object?

Homework Equations


ρobjVobjg = ρfluidVobjg

The Attempt at a Solution


So the correct answer is 2500 kg/m3 but when I set up the problem, it doesn't turn out correct.
ρobjVobjg = ρfluidVobjg
Both volumes and gravity cancel resulting with:
ρfluidobj
Is there an error in my set up? Thanks in advance!
You've assumed that the apparent weight is the product of some fictitious density and the volume of the object, neglecting Archimedes' Principle.

Remember that apparent weight of a submerged object = actual weight of the object in air - buoyant force of the water displaced by the object.
 
Right, 500 N - 200 N = 300 N. Conceptually this makes sense but I am trying to work this out algebraically. Also, just to be clear, you are saying that I cannot use ρobj algebraically this way?
 
brake4country said:
Right, 500 N - 200 N = 300 N. Conceptually this makes sense but I am trying to work this out algebraically. Also, just to be clear, you are saying that I cannot use ρobj algebraically this way?

It depends on what ρobj means. Is it derived from the mass of the object, as in ρobj = mobj / Vobj ?

It's still not clear why you can't solve this problem algebraically by applying Archimedes' Principle.
 
Can this even be solved algebraically even with an "apparent weight"? I understand apparent weight but in the formula written above: ρobjVobjg=ρfluidVobjg; if I follow math rules, ρobj should be = to ρfluid. Perhaps I am assuming something but I cannot see it.
 
brake4country said:
Can this even be solved algebraically even with an "apparent weight"? I understand apparent weight but in the formula written above: ρobjVobjg=ρfluidVobjg; if I follow math rules, ρobj should be = to ρfluid. Perhaps I am assuming something but I cannot see it.

Your math is flawless, but it is based on a faulty assumption. Here, let me highlight it for you (again):

You've assumed that the apparent weight is the product of some fictitious density and the volume of the object, neglecting Archimedes' Principle.

As I explained in a previous post, that's not how the apparent weight of the object is defined.
 
Oh ok. So, if apparent weight cannot be integrated in the algebra, can this be seen conceptually? Additionally, when ρobjfluid, the object would be seen as submerged but won't sink, yes? I think I am getting the idea now.
 
brake4country said:
Oh ok. So, if apparent weight cannot be integrated in the algebra, can this be seen conceptually?
This problem can be solved algebraically, just not in the way you are convinced it should be.

By ignoring what Archimedes principle is telling you about what the apparent weight of the object is when submerged, I really can't offer you any further guidance, except:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archimedes'_principle

Additionally, when ρobjfluid, the object would be seen as submerged but won't sink, yes? I think I am getting the idea now.

If the density of the object is the same as the density of the fluid in which it is immersed, the object is said to be neutrally buoyant, which is a fancy way of saying it won't float and it won't sink.

When submarines submerge, they take in just enough water as ballast to become neutrally buoyant. While submerged, the submarine changes depth by using its control planes to bring the bow up or down when the sub is going ahead. To surface, the submerged sub uses compressed air to remove water from the ballast tanks in order to restore positive buoyancy to the vessel, which then rises to the surface and floats naturally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
800
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K