Understanding Causality & Tacheyon Time Travel

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter munky99999
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the theoretical implications of tachyons and their relationship with causality in physics. Participants explore the paradox of events occurring out of order when tachyons, hypothetical particles that travel faster than light, are considered. The conversation highlights the definition of causality, emphasizing that event A must precede event B, and discusses the potential for tachyons to alter this sequence. Theoretical resources, including links to Wolfram Science and a mathematical overview of tachyons, are shared for further exploration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of causality in physics
  • Familiarity with the concept of tachyons
  • Basic knowledge of special relativity
  • Ability to interpret theoretical physics literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of tachyons on causality in theoretical physics
  • Study the principles of special relativity and its effects on time perception
  • Examine existing literature on tachyon propagation and information transfer
  • Explore the current status of tachyon research and experimental evidence
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, theoretical researchers, and students interested in advanced concepts of causality and the implications of faster-than-light particles in modern physics.

munky99999
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/CausalityProblem.html

If the tacheyon was going backwards in time, then how is this wrong, or contradictory?




Also, I'm not to sure of the definition of Causality, if it states event A must happen before B, then couldn't we further extend this to say ask long as time is moving forward. If time is going backward then would it not mean B before A?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
That problem is the result of A setting into affect the actions which result in B, say having a ladder kicked out from under you causes you to fall. if the events where to be connected faster than c, then you would fall before the ladder was kicked out from under you. Hence the paradox, you fall before some one kicks the ladder, and the causality has been affected. A no longer causes B because it happens afterwards.
 
ya i get that, but if time is moving backwards to the tacheyon, would it not be perfectly fine for the tacheyon, hence we are making a difficult frame of reference. In the tacheyons frame of reference it would all look completely correct, would it not?
 
I don't remember. Has anybody found a tachyon yet?

cookiemonster
 
nope entirely theoretical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K