B Can Time Truly Flow Backwards in Quantum Physics and Cosmology?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter thegroundhog
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Direction Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the nature of time as described by physicists like Sean Carroll and Carlo Rovelli, particularly the idea that the laws of physics do not inherently dictate a direction for time. It is argued that while macroscopic events appear to have a clear forward direction, fundamental physical laws allow for time to be reversed without contradiction. The concept of entropy is highlighted, suggesting that the increase in entropy gives the illusion of a forward flow of time, but this is not a fundamental requirement of the universe. The conversation emphasizes the distinction between theoretical reversibility in physics and the irreversible nature of everyday experiences. Ultimately, the complexity of time's direction and its relationship to physical laws remains a challenging topic for many to grasp.
  • #51
vanhees71 said:
The only velocity that is restricted to be is the signal velocity, i.e., the velocity with which the wave front propagates.
Hi vanhees:

I again reference Wikipedia.
In 1994 Nimtz and Horst Aichmann [3] carried out a tunneling experiment at the laboratories of Hewlett-Packard after which Nimtz stated [3] that the frequency modulated (FM) carrier wave transported a signal 4.7 times faster than light due to the effect of quantum tunneling.​

I think I must be misinterpreting the meaning of your quote at the top of this post, as well as what I underlined in the Wikipedia quote. Both seems to be saying that the information carried in the signal/message is traveling faster than c. However, since the speed of transmission of information is limited by relativity to be no greater than c, the quotes must mean the signal/message may travel faster than c, but the information carried by the signal does not. This would make sense only if we understand that part of the signal must get lost or distortred during the transmission. Is this correct?

Regards,
Buzz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
It's not you who is misinterpreting anything but Nimtz. Evanescent modes in wave guides (that's what "tunneling" means) are no exception to the "relativistic speed limit". Also there the front velocity is ##c## (at least within the standard electromagnetic theory of wave guides). It also hasn't anything to do with any quantum effect. Of course the math of tunneling in quantum theory is completely analogous to the tunneling of classical electromagnetic waves, but the meaning of a classical wave is very different from the wave function in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. I'm a bit puzzled by the somewhat biased Wikipedia entry on this subject.
 
  • Like
Likes Buzz Bloom

Similar threads

B How do we know what would happen if time reversed?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Can a quantum state be thought of simply as one allowing bidirectional time travel?
Replies
2
Views
1K
B Can Closed Timelike Curves Violate Entropy by Allowing Time Travel?
Replies
9
Views
2K
I Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?
Replies
35
Views
495
B Acceleration of time due to entropy
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Need help with understanding time travel
Replies
8
Views
2K
B Alien Perception of Time: Can Time Go Backwards?
Replies
3
Views
2K
The big crunch effect on entropy and time
Replies
1
Views
2K
B Question about the Entropy of a Black Hole Singularity
Replies
17
Views
3K
B An Interpretation of the Geometry of Space-Time Inside a BH
Replies
7
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top