Understanding CP Violation in Two-Body Decay of K Mesons

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vinci128
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Decay Meson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the CP violation observed in the two-body decay of K mesons, as initially described by Cristenson, Cronin, Fitch, and Turlay in 1964. The participants clarify that for two-body decays, the decay angle should theoretically be zero, influenced by momentum conservation principles. In contrast, three-body decays exhibit a non-zero angle due to the complexities of momentum distribution. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between kaon energy and decay angles in particle physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of CP violation in particle physics
  • Knowledge of two-body and three-body decay processes
  • Familiarity with momentum conservation laws
  • Basic concepts of kaon physics and their decay mechanisms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the original 1964 paper by Cristenson et al. on CP violation in K mesons
  • Research momentum conservation in particle decay processes
  • Explore the implications of kaon energy on decay angles
  • Learn about experimental techniques for measuring decay angles in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, students studying CP violation, and researchers interested in the decay mechanisms of K mesons will benefit from this discussion.

Vinci128
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone,
i was reading the article of Cristenson,Cronin,Fitch and Turlay of 1964, the one that discovered CP violation in the system of neutral K mesons. There is one point in it that i don't get it. They say "the angle should be zero for two body decay and is, in general, different from zero for three body decay". Based to what i know, it must be conserved the longitudinal and transversal component of the momentum, so if the boost is high, the angle should be small. It's this the right explanation for the very small angle of decay observed?

I really appreciate any help you can provide.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Which angle? I don't find the quoted text in the original work.

Edit: Oops, typo, found it.

The angle is small for highly boosted kaons, but still notable in most (edit: three-body!) decays - the kaon energy was not that high in their beam.
The observed peak at 1 in the right mass range (and only there) is a clear evidence for two-body decays.
 
Last edited:
I was thinking the same thing. That's why i don't understand why the angle must be so near to zero.
 
For a two-body decay, it must be zero (just smeared out by resolution effects). This is just momentum conservation - momentum before is the same as momentum after the decay.

For a three-body decay, the angle can be different.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vinci128
Thanks, reading the article better i have seen that the angle is between the vector sum of the momentum and the direction of the k meson. I thinked it was between the momentum of the single pion and original direction of the kaon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
955
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K