B Understanding Friction: The Impact of Inter-Molecular Bonding on Movement

AI Thread Summary
Friction arises from the inter-molecular bonding between a solid body and the surface it rests on, with heavier objects creating more contact area and stronger bonds that resist movement. As pressure increases from the weight of the solid, the molecules bond more tightly to the surface, leading to greater friction. The discussion touches on the concept of melting, suggesting that as a solid melts, the pressure and inter-molecular bonding decrease, allowing for easier movement. However, the response critiques this notion, pointing out contradictions and the lack of clarity in the argument. The thread concludes that the original premise needs substantial revision before further discussion can occur.
rudransh verma
Gold Member
Messages
1,067
Reaction score
96
Imagine a solid body big and heavy. It will have friction between it and the surface when tried to move. Somehow the cluster of molecules opposes the push.

When free these molecules stick on surface and can be moved by a mere blow of wind but when bonded into a solid body the structure of large collection of molecules put pressure on the molecules below and the actual contact area increases as we increase weight. Now the molecules come very close to the surface and this creates inter molecular bonding which opposes any applied force on the body. When we apply force on above part of the body it opposes our push because it’s bonded to the molecules that are in turn weakly bonded to the surface.

In starting the body is heavy. More actual contact area. More bonding and so more opposing of movement of above part of body experiencing more friction. As the body starts melting(and let’s just wipe out the melted part) the pressure of above molecules on the very lower part decrease and so does the inter molecular bonding. This means lesser force on the upper part and the body will move more easily with the lowest layer of molecules in touch with surface.
Am I thinking it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rudransh verma said:
Imagine a solid body big and heavy. It will have friction between it and the surface when tried to move. Somehow the cluster of molecules opposes the push.

When free these molecules stick on surface and can be moved by a mere blow of wind but when bonded into a solid body the structure of large collection of molecules put pressure on the molecules below and the actual contact area increases as we increase weight. Now the molecules come very close to the surface and this creates inter molecular bonding which opposes any applied force on the body. When we apply force on above part of the body it opposes our push because it’s bonded to the molecules that are in turn weakly bonded to the surface.

In starting the body is heavy. More actual contact area. More bonding and so more opposing of movement of above part of body experiencing more friction. As the body starts melting(and let’s just wipe out the melted part) the pressure of above molecules on the very lower part decrease and so does the inter molecular bonding. This means lesser force on the upper part and the body will move more easily with the lowest layer of molecules in touch with surface.
Am I thinking it right?
To answer your final question first. Answer: No.

Why mention melting if you are then saying to just wipe it out?
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters
rudransh verma said:
When free...
As the body starts melting(and let’s just wipe out the melted part)
You haven't substantively changed your post. If anything, you've added contradictions (talk about water without talking about water?) that make it worse. Thread closed. Please don't re-start the thread unless you are actually making the change to the premise you say you want to make.
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top