Understanding Im(z)^2: Clarifying the Calculation in Your Textbook

  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers around the interpretation of the notation Im(z)^2 in a textbook, questioning whether it refers to the square of the imaginary part of z or the imaginary part of z squared. Participants suggest that Im(z^2) is the correct notation for the imaginary part of z squared, while Im(z)^2 would indicate the square of the imaginary part. There is uncertainty about whether there are strict conventions for this notation, with some expressing a preference for clarity in mathematical expressions. The consensus leans towards providing both interpretations when in doubt. Ultimately, clarity in notation is emphasized to avoid confusion in mathematical communication.
johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
Just wondering what my textbook wants me to do with:

Im(z)2

Im i supposed to find the square of the imaginary part of z, or the imaginary part of z2?

Does Im(z)2 equal (Im(z))2 or Im(z2) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johann1301 said:
Just wondering what my textbook wants me to do with:

Im(z)2

Im i supposed to find the square of the imaginary part of z, or the imaginary part of z2?

Does Im(z)2 equal (Im(z))2 or Im(z2) ?

I woulds guess that the imaginary part of ##z^2## would be written as ##\text{Im}(z^2)##, so I would guess that you are being asked for ##(\text{Im}(z))^2##. However, when in doubt, why not give both interpretations and both answers?
 
Ray Vickson said:
I woulds guess that the imaginary part of ##z^2## would be written as ##\text{Im}(z^2)##, so I would guess that you are being asked for ##(\text{Im}(z))^2##. However, when in doubt, why not give both interpretations and both answers?

Yez, that would be the right way to go! I guess i was wondering if there were any strict rules. Also, perhaps it could be expressed in a similar manner as (sin(x))2, that is - most of the time - written as sin2x. Perhaps there is a standard for Im2(z) as well?
 
I am inclined to think a book would want Im(z2), for a simple reason: finding Im(z) and then squaring it isn't much of an exercise. Finding the imaginary part of z2 is a bit more serious.
However, this is just an opinion. I'd have to flip through the book to see if the writer is that sloppy in more places...
 
##\operatorname{Im}(z)^2## is a really weird notation. I would use ##(\operatorname{Im} z)^2## for the square of the imaginary part of z, and ##\operatorname{Im}z^2## for the imaginary part of ##z^2##.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K