Understanding Killing Vectors & Schwarzschild Geodesics

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Killing vectors in the context of Schwarzschild geodesics as presented in Carroll's book. A Killing vector satisfies the equation $$\nabla_{(\mu}K_{\nu)}=0$$, indicating that the quantity ##K_\nu p^\nu## is conserved along a geodesic, where ##p^\nu## represents the 4-momentum. The discussion emphasizes the relationship between Killing vectors and continuous symmetries of the metric, asserting that a time isometry corresponds to a Killing vector of the form ##K=\left(1,0,0,0\right)## in appropriate coordinates. Additionally, it notes that while the components of a timelike Killing field can vary with the coordinate system, it is always possible to find a coordinate system where these components take the specified form.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) principles
  • Familiarity with Killing vectors and their properties
  • Knowledge of Schwarzschild metric and geodesics
  • Basic grasp of differential geometry and tensor calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Killing vectors in General Relativity
  • Learn about the Schwarzschild metric and its symmetries
  • Explore the construction of coordinate systems in curved spacetime
  • Investigate the relationship between isometries and conservation laws in GR
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in theoretical physics, particularly those focused on General Relativity, differential geometry, and the study of symmetries in spacetime metrics.

George Keeling
Gold Member
Messages
183
Reaction score
42
TL;DR
I think I now realise stuff about Killing vectors. Am I correct?
I'm on to section 5.4 of Carroll's book on Schwarzschild geodesics and he says stuff in it which, I think, enlightens me on the use of Killing vectors. I had to go back to section 3.8 on Symmetries and Killing vectors. I now understand the following:

A Killing vector satisfies $$
\nabla_{(\mu}K_{\nu)}=0
$$and that implies that ##K_\nu p^\nu## is conserved along a geodesic. ##p^\nu## is a 4-momentum.

Carroll says "In fact, if a vector ##K^\mu## satisfies Killing's equation, it will always be possible to find a coordinate system in which ##K=\partial_{\sigma\ast}##". ##x^{\sigma\ast}## was the coordinate of which the metric was independent. That is ##\partial_{\sigma\ast}g_{\mu\nu}=0##. So in GR if the coordinate was ##t## then we would have a ##K^\mu=\left(1,0,0,0\right)##. If the metric equation does not contain ##t## it must have such a Killing vector. It must then satisfy the equation ##\nabla_{(\mu}K_{\nu)}=0## and that implies that that ##K_\nu p^\nu## is conserved along a geodesic.

A few lines further on he says
"As we investigate in Appendix B, Killing vector fields on a manifold are in on-to-one correspondence with continuous symmetries of the metric [isometries] on that manifold".

From the second statement (slightly stretched) we infer that a time isometry must imply a Killing vector ##K=\left(1,0,0,0\right)## and with a Schwarzschild metric a ##\phi## isometry implies a Killing vector ##R=\left(0,0,0,1\right)##.

Is that all correct? I want to check before I proceed, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Whether or not a timelike Killing field has components (1,0,0,0) or not depends on your coordinate system. However, it is always possible to construct a coordinate system in such a way that those would be the components. Note that this says nothing about your actually chosen coordinate system. For example, it is not the case for Kruskal-Szekeres coordinates on Schwarzschild spacetime.

There are also other rotations from those generated by ##\partial_\phi## that are symmetries of the Schwarzschild metric. They will not have that simple form (but you can construct a new coordinate system where they do).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: George Keeling and vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
979
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K