Understanding London Dispersion Force: Theoretical Derivation Explained

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gavroy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dispersion Force
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical derivation of the London dispersion force, a type of Van der Waals force. Participants explore resources and references that may provide a derivation of the potential energy expression associated with this force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about the lack of a theoretical derivation for the London dispersion force as presented in chemistry literature.
  • Another participant suggests that the original papers by London and related literature may provide insights into the derivation.
  • Specific references are mentioned, including London's original papers and various textbooks that contain derivations or discussions related to the London dispersion force.
  • A participant shares a link to online lecture notes that contain a derivation similar to those found in the referenced literature.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on a definitive derivation but share various resources that may help in understanding the theoretical background of the London dispersion force.

Contextual Notes

Some references provided may contain hand-waving derivations or varying levels of rigor, which could affect the clarity of the theoretical explanation.

Gavroy
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
hi,
lately i am concerned with Van der Waals forces and I often found in chemistry books the so-called London dispersion force, which says that the potential energy of the Van der Waals interaction is:

U=-2/3 a1a2I1I2/(r^6*(I1+I2)

but by now I could not find a theoretical derivation of this approximation?

does anybody know one in the internet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You'll probably get better results asking this on the Atoms & Molecules forum
 
To begin with there's London's original papers:
Eisenschitz and London, Z. Physik 60, 491 (1930), London, Z. Physik 63, 245 (1930)

They're also available in (a somewhat mediocre) translation in Hettema "Quantum Chemistry, Classic Scientific Papers", if you can find it. There's a somewhat hand-waving derivation in Landau-Lifgarbagez volume 3, §89. Also in Atkins and Friedman's "Molecular quantum mechanics" section 12.5 (3rd edition).

I found an online account in some lecture notes http://www.soton.ac.uk/~compchem/other/perturbation_theory.pdf" , page 32-34. It's the same derivation as used in all the above.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
ah, this is exactly what i was looking for, thank you
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
581
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
12K