Understanding Poisson Distribution: Explanation & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter nothGing
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Poisson
Click For Summary
The Poisson distribution describes events occurring randomly over an interval, with specific conditions for subintervals. The first condition states that the probability of more than one event occurring in a very small subinterval is effectively zero, meaning that during such a brief period, multiple events are highly unlikely. However, this probability is not truly zero but can be considered vanishingly small compared to the probability of a single event. The discussion highlights that while the probability of one event is proportional to the length of the interval, the chance of multiple events diminishes rapidly as the interval shrinks. Understanding these nuances is crucial for correctly applying the Poisson process in practical scenarios.
nothGing
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The explanation for the Poisson distribution in reference book is "
when given an interval of real number, assume events occur at random throughout the interval. If the interval can be partitioned into subintervals of small enough length such that
1. the probability of more than 1 event in a subinterval is 0
2. thw probability of one events in a subinterval is the same for all subintervals and proportional to the length of the subinterval, and
3. the event in each interval is indepedent of other subintervals, the random experiment is called " POISSON process". "

But i don't really understand what is it mean for part 1.
Can anyone explain to me?
thx..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the probability of more than 1 event in a subinterval is 0

Suppose the interval is time: this means that during a short enough time interval the chance of having multiple occurrences of the event is zero.

Suppose the "interval" is a region of area (you are looking at paint flaws in a newly manufactured car, as an example): if you look at a small enough area the chance of having multiple flaws is 0
 
1. the probability of more than 1 event in a subinterval is 0
This is misleading, since the probability is never 0, although it can be vanishingly small compared to the probability of 1 event. For small intervals, the ratio is proportional to the length of the interval.
 
[This is misleading, since the probability is never 0, although it can be vanishingly small compared to the probability of 1 event. ]
"Mathman", I don't really understand what do you mean since it's different way of explanation from "statdad".
Can you explain some more? thx..
 
P(n events in an interval) is e-x xn/n!, where x is some parameter.
For intervals, x is proportional to the length of the interval. P(n=2)/P(n=1) = x/2, while P for larger n disappear more quickly.
However no matter how small the interval is, the probability is not 0, as long as x > 0.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K