Understanding Quantum Physics Identities

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
kennalj65
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, so today for our quantum physics class we were supposed to go through these identities, [itex]|+_x > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> + |->)[/itex][itex]|-_x > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> - |->)[/itex]
[itex]|+_y > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> + i|->)[/itex]
[itex]|-_y > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> - i|->)[/itex]where |+ (x)> would represent spin up in the x direction for example, and |+> simply denotes spin up in (I believe) the z direction.
now I couldn't make sense of any of it, had no idea where they came from and what the proof is, I came home and googled it and noticed a strong resemblance to the pauli matrices (which I have discovered as of half an hour ago), so I'm hoping someone could enlighten me as to what this means and where it comes from.
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Pauli matrices are the matrix elements of the operators
[tex]\hat{\sigma}^j=\frac{2}{\hbar} \hat{s}^j,[/tex]
where [itex]\hat{s}_j[/itex] are the spin components of a spin-1/2 particle.

The Pauli matrix are the matrix elements with respect to the eigenbasis of [itex]\hat{\sigma}^3[/itex],
[tex]\hat{\sigma}^3 |k \rangle=k |k \rangle, \quad k \in \{-1,1 \},[/tex]
where the choice of the 3-component is conventional. The Pauli matrices are given by
[tex]{\sigma^{j}}_{kl}=\langle{k}|\hat{\sigma}^j|l\rangle, \quad k,l \in \{-1,1 \}.[/tex]

You can easily calculate the Pauli matrices by making use of the raising- and lowering operators
[tex]\hat{\sigma}^{\pm} = \hat{\sigma}^{1} \pm \mathrm{i} \hat{\sigma}^{2}.[/tex]
Just look in your textbook, how those operate on the basis vectors!