Understanding Quantum Physics Identities

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the identities of quantum states represented in terms of spin states, specifically |+_x>, |-_x>, |+_y>, and |-_y>. These identities are derived from the Pauli matrices, which are essential for understanding the behavior of spin-1/2 particles. The Pauli matrices are defined as the matrix elements of the operators \hat{\sigma}^j, which relate to the spin components of a particle. The discussion emphasizes the connection between these identities and the raising and lowering operators, \hat{\sigma}^{\pm}, used in quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly spin-1/2 particles.
  • Familiarity with Pauli matrices and their significance in quantum physics.
  • Knowledge of quantum state notation and representation.
  • Basic grasp of linear algebra, specifically matrix operations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and properties of Pauli matrices in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the raising and lowering operators, \hat{\sigma}^{\pm}, and their applications.
  • Explore the implications of spin states in quantum computing and quantum information theory.
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of quantum state representation and transformations.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum physics, physicists specializing in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the mathematical framework of quantum states and spin systems.

kennalj65
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, so today for our quantum physics class we were supposed to go through these identities, [itex]|+_x > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> + |->)[/itex][itex]|-_x > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> - |->)[/itex]
[itex]|+_y > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> + i|->)[/itex]
[itex]|-_y > = \frac{1}{2^{0.5}} (|+> - i|->)[/itex]where |+ (x)> would represent spin up in the x direction for example, and |+> simply denotes spin up in (I believe) the z direction.
now I couldn't make sense of any of it, had no idea where they came from and what the proof is, I came home and googled it and noticed a strong resemblance to the pauli matrices (which I have discovered as of half an hour ago), so I'm hoping someone could enlighten me as to what this means and where it comes from.
Thanks in advance
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Pauli matrices are the matrix elements of the operators
[tex]\hat{\sigma}^j=\frac{2}{\hbar} \hat{s}^j,[/tex]
where [itex]\hat{s}_j[/itex] are the spin components of a spin-1/2 particle.

The Pauli matrix are the matrix elements with respect to the eigenbasis of [itex]\hat{\sigma}^3[/itex],
[tex]\hat{\sigma}^3 |k \rangle=k |k \rangle, \quad k \in \{-1,1 \},[/tex]
where the choice of the 3-component is conventional. The Pauli matrices are given by
[tex]{\sigma^{j}}_{kl}=\langle{k}|\hat{\sigma}^j|l\rangle, \quad k,l \in \{-1,1 \}.[/tex]

You can easily calculate the Pauli matrices by making use of the raising- and lowering operators
[tex]\hat{\sigma}^{\pm} = \hat{\sigma}^{1} \pm \mathrm{i} \hat{\sigma}^{2}.[/tex]
Just look in your textbook, how those operate on the basis vectors!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
575
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K