Phase factors and Modulus Square?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical treatment of phase factors and modulus squares in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of angular momentum operators. Participants explore the implications of taking the modulus square of matrix elements and the potential for complex solutions, as well as the use of raising and lowering operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether, when taking the modulus square of a matrix element, one must consider all possible values of ##c##, including negative and imaginary values, leading to the possibility of complex solutions.
  • Another participant suggests using the raising and lowering operators ##L_+=L_x+iL_y## and ##L_-=L_x-iL_y## to derive expressions for ##L_x## and ##L_y##, indicating that the computations are straightforward.
  • There is a reiteration of the need to compute ##L_x## and ##L_y## using the results of the raising and lowering operators acting on the states, with specific reference to the matrix elements involved.
  • One participant asserts that the constant ##c## is always positive and discusses the potential for matrix elements to include an arbitrary phase factor of the form ##exp(i \phi)##.
  • Another participant confirms that ##c## can be replaced with ##ce^{i\phi}##, emphasizing that this only introduces a constant phase factor and is a matter of convention.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the treatment of the modulus square and the implications of complex solutions. While some agree on the use of phase factors, there is no consensus on the necessity of considering negative or imaginary values for ##c##.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes unresolved mathematical steps and assumptions regarding the nature of the constant ##c## and the implications of phase factors in quantum mechanics.

kq6up
Messages
366
Reaction score
13
If I have something like:

$$\lvert \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle \rvert ^2=c$$.

where ##c## is any old real number. If I undid the modulus square to find:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle=\pm \sqrt{c} $$ Would I not have to consider ##c## as being negative, positive as well as imaginary negative positive? So:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x+i\hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle=\pm i \sqrt{c} $$ as well.

I am trying to get to:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x \rvert M-1 \rangle=\frac{1}{2} \sqrt{c} $$

and:

$$ \langle M \lvert \hat{L}_y \rvert M-1 \rangle=-\frac{i}{2} \sqrt{c} $$

From Landau and Lifshitz QM 3ed page 89, and I am not following. Any tips will be appreciated.

Thanks,
KQ6UP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need the raising and lowering operators: ## L_+=L_x+iL_y ## and ## L_-=L_x-iL_y ##. You can solve for ## L_x ## and ## L_y ## and substitute. The computations are straightforward using the formulas for the result of ## L_+ ## and ## L_- ## operating on the state ## | M > ## (or ## | M-1> ##, etc.).
 
Charles Link said:
You need the raising and lowering operators: ## L_+=L_x+iL_y ## and ## L_-=L_x-iL_y ##. You can solve for ## L_x ## and ## L_y ## and substitute. The computations are straightforward using the formulas for the result of ## L_+ ## and ## L_- ## operating on the state ## | M > ## (or ## | M-1> ##, etc.).

That is where I started before ##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_+ \rvert M-1 \rangle=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##, and I am trying to get to:

##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x \rvert M-1 \rangle=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##

Thanks,
KQ6UP
 
kq6up said:
That is where I started before ##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_+ \rvert M-1 \rangle=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##, and I am trying to get to:

##\langle M \lvert \hat{L}_x \rvert M-1 \rangle=\frac{1}{2}\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}##

Thanks,
KQ6UP
You can readily compute ## L_x=(L_++L_-)/2 ## . ## \\ ## ## L_- |M-1> ## will give some number times ## |M-2> ##. The matrix element ## <M|M-2> =0 ## and ## <M|M> =1 ##. Also note ## L_+|M-1>=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}|M> ##.
 
Charles Link said:
You can readily compute ## L_x=(L_++L_-)/2 ## . ## \\ ## ## L_- |M-1> ## will give some number times ## |M-2> ##. The matrix element ## <M|M-2> =0 ## and ## <M|M> =1 ##. Also note ## L_+|M-1>=\sqrt{(L+M)(L-M+1)}|M> ##.

This is true. However, I am still wondering about my original question. When you "undo" the square of a modulus, it seems reasonable to me that you would have a family of solutions as detailed above. Is this true?

Thanks,
KQ6UP
 
kq6up said:
This is true. However, I am still wondering about my original question. When you "undo" the square of a modulus, it seems reasonable to me that you would have a family of solutions as detailed above. Is this true?

Thanks,
KQ6UP
Your "c" above is always positive. I think one question you are asking is might these matrix elements always contain an arbitrary phase factor of the form ## exp(i \phi) ##, and I think the answer to this is yes.
 
Just confirming what Charles has said above, one can always replace ##c## with ##ce^{i\phi}## as this will only impose a constant phase factor on the state. It's chosen as real positive just a matter of convention, pretty much the same case as the constants ##\sqrt{n+1}## and ##\sqrt{n}## in the raising and lowering operators in harmonic oscillator.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kq6up, Charles Link and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K