Understanding Skewness in Excel

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FrostScYthe
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
FrostScYthe
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm using the following formula to calculate skewness

[tex]g_1 = \frac{m_3}{m_2^{3/2}} <br /> = \frac{\tfrac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\overline{x})^3}{\left(\tfrac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\overline{x})^2\right)^{3/2}}\ ,[/tex]

However, when I try excel on to calculate skewness I get a different results. For example this set:

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9

I get: 1.33630621
Excel gets: 1.619847741

Is excel using a different formula, or am I doing something wrong? O_o

Ted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any particular reason why
excel uses a different formula?


Ted.
 
FrostScYthe said:
Any particular reason why
excel uses a different formula?


Ted.

I can't really answer why their choice was made. Note that unlike the mean (for example) there are several quantities proposed to estimate skewness, and none is really preferred as "the correct way" to do it.