Understanding Skewness in Excel

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FrostScYthe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the calculation of skewness in Excel compared to a formula proposed by a participant. It explores the differences in results obtained using Excel and a manual calculation method, raising questions about the underlying formulas used by Excel.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a formula for calculating skewness based on the third and second moments of a dataset.
  • Another participant suggests that Excel uses a different formula for skewness, though the exact formula is not fully detailed.
  • A participant questions the reasoning behind Excel's choice of formula, indicating that there are multiple methods for estimating skewness without a universally accepted standard.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the differences in skewness calculations and the rationale behind Excel's formula. There is no consensus on which formula is preferable or why Excel's approach differs.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that there are several proposed methods for estimating skewness, and the choice of method may depend on specific contexts or definitions, which remain unresolved in the discussion.

FrostScYthe
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

I'm using the following formula to calculate skewness

g_1 = \frac{m_3}{m_2^{3/2}} <br /> = \frac{\tfrac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\overline{x})^3}{\left(\tfrac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n (x_i-\overline{x})^2\right)^{3/2}}\ ,

However, when I try excel on to calculate skewness I get a different results. For example this set:

1
1
1
1
1
1
1
9
9

I get: 1.33630621
Excel gets: 1.619847741

Is excel using a different formula, or am I doing something wrong? O_o

Ted.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I believe Excel uses this:

<br /> \frac n {(n-1)(n-2)} \sum{\left(\frac{x - \bar x}{s}\right)^2}<br />
 
Any particular reason why
excel uses a different formula?


Ted.
 
FrostScYthe said:
Any particular reason why
excel uses a different formula?


Ted.

I can't really answer why their choice was made. Note that unlike the mean (for example) there are several quantities proposed to estimate skewness, and none is really preferred as "the correct way" to do it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K