Understanding the Covariance of the Spin Projection Operator in Rest Frame?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the covariance of the spin projection operator expressed as (1 - γ5 ŝ)/2. The initial confusion stems from its definition in the rest frame and the assertion of its covariance due to the slashed notation. It is clarified that the direction of polarization, represented by s, satisfies the condition s · s = -1. The key to understanding its covariance lies in applying the identity involving the spin operator and gamma matrices. Ultimately, the resolution of the confusion is deemed straightforward once the identity is correctly utilized.
LayMuon
Messages
149
Reaction score
1
I cannot quite understand why expression \frac{1-\gamma_5 \slashed{s}}{2} is covariant? We defined it in the rest frame, and then said that because it is in the slashed expression, it's covariant, what does that mean? s is the direction of polarization, s \cdot s = -1
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Figured it out, one should use the identity \hat{S}(\hat{a}) \gamma^\nu \hat{S}^{-1} (\hat{a}) = a_\mu ^{\text{ } \nu} \gamma^\mu, the rest is straightforward.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
888
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K