Understanding the Difference Between 'Finding' and 'Find' as Nouns

  • Thread starter Thread starter feynman1
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies the distinction between the nouns "finding" and "find." A finding refers to a conclusion derived from an inquiry or investigation, often expected but potentially surprising in detail. In contrast, a find denotes an unexpected object or idea of significant value, which may arise from deliberate investigation. The conversation emphasizes that this semantic difference is straightforward and does not warrant further debate, leading to the closure of the thread.
feynman1
Messages
435
Reaction score
29
What's the difference between them as nouns?
 
Science news on Phys.org
A finding is a conclusion reached as a result of an inquiry, investigation, or trial. The existence of such a result It is typically not a surprise although its detail may be.
A find is an object or idea of high value whose existence is not really expected although it may be the result of concerted investigation

At least in my personal lexicon

.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba, BillTre and feynman1
Even in the lounge, semantics is not what this site is about. The above answer requires no further discussion. Thread closed.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • Like
Likes phinds

Thread 'Songs that pay homage to deceased artists, no covers'

There is a neighboring thread Cover songs versus the original track, which ones are better? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/cover-songs-versus-the-original-track-which-ones-are-better.1050205/ which is an endless subject and as colorful are the posts there. I came across a Buddy Holly cover by Eva Cassidy only to find out that the Buddy Holly song was already a Paul Anka cover. Anyway, both artists who had covered the song have passed far too early in their lives. That gave me the...
View full post »

Thread 'Why is the plural for moose not meese?'

The piece came-up from the "Lame Jokes" section of the forum. Someobody carried a step from one of the posts and I became curious and tried a brief web search. A web page gives some justification of sorts why we can use goose(s)-geese(p), but not moose(s)-meese(p). Look for the part of the page headed with "Why isn't "meese" the correct plural?" https://languagetool.org/insights/post/plural-of-moose/
View full post »

Similar threads

Contractions in English: Adj + Noun
Replies
13
Views
1K
Reject vs Rejection: Understanding the Difference
Replies
5
Views
1K
Should "any" be followed by plural form of nouns?
Replies
9
Views
3K
Nouns that exist only in the plural
2
Replies
99
Views
7K
  • Poll Poll
Grammatically speaking, which would you consider more correct?
Replies
1
Views
2K
MHB N and V: Finding the Right Balance
Replies
2
Views
1K
No wonder English is difficult for new learners
Replies
24
Views
4K
Instrumentation vs Measurement: What’s the Difference?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?
2
Replies
98
Views
2K
Difference between the words "material" and "matter"
Replies
12
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top