B Understanding the Differences between Quartiles and Percentiles

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter YouAreAwesome
  • Start date Start date
YouAreAwesome
Gold Member
Messages
70
Reaction score
33
TL;DR Summary
Which way of calculating Q1 is correct, by formula or by logic?
Set of 18 scores = [2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 8, 8, 9, 9, 10, 10]

Find Q1 by formula
Q1 is the (n+1)/4 th term (where n is the number of scores)
Q1 is the 19/4 th term, or the 4.75 th score.
Q1 is 0.75 of the way between scores 3 and 4 (the 4th and 5th scores in the set).
Q1=3.75
See https://www.hackmath.net/en/calculator/quartile-q1-q3

Find Q1 by logic
Q1 is the median of the "lower set" of scores - that is, if we split the scores into two equal sets at the median, the median of the lower of these is Q1.
The median of the of the Set provided above is 6.
The median of the lower Set provided above is 4.
See https://www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/statistics/quartile-calculator.php

My question is, which of these methods is correct? And if both are correct but for different purposes, what are those purposes?

Thanks
YAA
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pbuk said:
There is no agreed "correct" answer. This is covered reasonably well on Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quartile#Computing_methods.
Thanks. Now I have to go looking for what the Australian, NSW syllabus specifically wants from its students I suppose.
 
YouAreAwesome said:
Thanks. Now I have to go looking for what the Australian, NSW syllabus specifically wants from its students I suppose.
You could ask them about percentiles for a small sample while you're at it!
 
  • Like
Likes YouAreAwesome
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Back
Top