Understanding the Fourier Transform in Solving the Heat Equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Fourier Transform in solving the heat equation, specifically the equation ##u_t = u_{xx}## under certain boundary conditions. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of solutions involving integrals and the role of coefficients in the context of infinite series and integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Josh questions the origin of the ##d\lambda## in the integral representation of the solution to the heat equation.
  • Some participants suggest that ##d\lambda## is related to the expansion coefficients and normalization conditions in the context of Fourier series.
  • There is a discussion about how changing the normalization of the basis affects the coefficients in both finite and infinite cases.
  • One participant proposes that the integral representation can be viewed as a linear combination of an uncountable set of solutions, with each coefficient being ##c(\lambda) d\lambda##.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the transition from sums to integrals when considering the infinite case, questioning the role of ##\Delta k##.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the role of ##d\lambda## and the normalization process, indicating that multiple competing views remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the implications of these mathematical concepts.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexities involved in transitioning from finite to infinite cases and the assumptions underlying the normalization of basis functions. Specific mathematical steps and definitions are not fully resolved.

member 428835
Hi PF! I was wondering if you could clarify something for me. Specifically, I am solving the heat equation ##u_t = u_{xx}## subject to ##| u(\pm \infty , t ) | < \infty##. Now this implies a solution of sines and cosines times an exponential. Since we have a linear PDE, we may superimpose each solution (we have infinitely many since ##\lambda##, the separation constant, need only be positive or negative, depending on how we define it).

Since ##\lambda## is continuous we may sum via the Reimann integral, as $$\int_0^\infty c_1(\lambda ) \sin (\sqrt{\lambda} x) \exp (- \lambda k t) d \lambda$$. There would also be a cosine expression. My question is, where does the ##d \lambda## come from? Can someone please explain?

Thanks so much!

Josh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is part of the expansion coefficient. If you compare with the ##1/L## you get when you normalise the basis of a Fourier series, you cannot do that here and the normalisation condition is that you get a delta function rather than one, the ##1/L## essentially becomes your ##d\lambda##.
 
so it comes from determining the coefficients?
 
If you look at the finite case, you can always change your coefficients by changing the normalisation of the basis. This is the case also in the infinite case, but in order to have a normalisation that makes sense, you need to add the infinitesimal ##d\lambda## (i.e., the coefficient of ##\sin(\ldots)\exp(\ldots)## is really ##c(\lambda) d\lambda## in order for the normalisation of the basis to make sense).
 
Orodruin said:
If you look at the finite case, you can always change your coefficients by changing the normalisation of the basis.
Can you elaborate on this?
 
The general idea is to write the solution as
$$
\sum c_k f_k(x,t)
$$
where the ##f_k(x,t)## each satisfy the differential equation. If you define ##g_k(x,t) = f_k(x,t) \sqrt{L}##, you will still be able to write the solution as
$$
\sum c_k' g_k(x,t) = \sum \frac{c_k}{\sqrt L} g_k(x,t)
$$
and ##g_k(x,t)## also satisfies the differential equation, but also an additional normalisation condition. When you go to the infinite case, the sum goes to an integral.
 
When you go to the infinite case, the sum goes to an integral.
When you say infinite case are you referring to ##L \to \infty##? I'm sure you're referring to ##k \to \infty## but then where is the ##\Delta k##?
 
Yes. But I think you are reading too much into the appearance of the ##d\lambda## in the integral. I suggest simply seeing it as a linear combination of your (uncountable) set of solutions. The coefficient of each is ##c(\lambda) d\lambda##.
 
Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K