Understanding the Imaginary Component in Spherical Harmonics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter repugno
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the physical interpretation of the imaginary component in spherical harmonics, exploring its implications for wave functions and the representation of shapes in quantum mechanics. Participants examine the role of the imaginary part in relation to the modulus squared of the spherical harmonics and its significance in maintaining theoretical consistency.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested, Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the physical interpretation of the imaginary component in spherical harmonics, noting that sketches typically exclude these components.
  • Another participant asserts that the wave function itself lacks physical interpretation, emphasizing that only the modulus squared has significance, suggesting the imaginary part is inconsequential.
  • A different participant raises a concern that taking the modulus squared results in the loss of information regarding the azimuth angle and the imaginary component, questioning whether this is problematic for understanding shapes.
  • It is proposed that the imaginary part functions as a phase factor, which may have implications for the overall interpretation.
  • A participant reiterates the concern about losing information when taking the modulus squared, suggesting that this loss is an acceptable trade-off for maintaining theoretical consistency.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of the imaginary component in spherical harmonics, with some arguing it is inconsequential while others highlight potential issues with losing information about shapes. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these differing interpretations.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the treatment of the imaginary component and its implications may depend on specific definitions and interpretations within quantum mechanics. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in relating the imaginary components to physical interpretations.

repugno
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
What is the physical interpretation of the imaginary component in the spherical harmonics? I am under the impression that when we sketch the shapes of the spherical harmonics we exclude the imaginary components.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We typically do. The wave function itself has no physical interpretation, merely its modulus squared, so by itself the imaginary part is of no physical consequence.

In fact, one can show that the eigenstates of a hamiltonian can always be chosen to be real.
 
When we take the modulus squared of the spherical harmonics we loose the term containing the azimuth angle and the imaginary number. Isn't this a problem since we loose information about the shapes?
 
The imaginary part of the harmonic is a phase function.
 
repugno said:
When we take the modulus squared of the spherical harmonics we loose the term containing the azimuth angle and the imaginary number. Isn't this a problem since we loose information about the shapes?

Consider it a price to be payed in order to keep the theory consistent. As already stated, for pure states phase factors are factorized through.

Daniel.
 

Similar threads

Undergrad When does the separation of variables work
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Understanding the dynamics of a perturbed quantum harmonic oscillator
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Undergrad Computing inner products of spherical harmonics
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Graduate Superposition of spherical harmonics
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Undergrad Understanding the Irreducible Solution in Classical Harmonic Oscillators
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Can angular momentum be applied to non circular rotations?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Undergrad Dot product of two vector operators in unusual coordinates
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Graduate About Ruling Out Real-Valued Standard Formalism of Quantum Theory
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Graduate Ground state calculation with a time averaged wave function
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Graduate Phase difference between electric and magnetic dipole moment
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K