Understanding the Levi-Civita Symbol and Commutators in Quantum Mechanics

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter vertices
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutators
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Levi-Civita symbol and its application in quantum mechanics, specifically in the context of commutators involving gamma matrices. The user initially questions the calculation of the spin operator \(\Sigma^1\) and provides a derivation that leads to the conclusion that \(\Sigma^1 = i[\gamma^2, \gamma^3]\). The user clarifies that the anticommutation relation \(\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu = -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu\) holds true only for spatial components, while the time component \(\gamma^0\) behaves differently, confirming that \(\gamma^0\gamma^0 = 1\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly spin operators.
  • Familiarity with gamma matrices and their properties in quantum field theory.
  • Knowledge of the Levi-Civita symbol and its role in tensor calculus.
  • Basic grasp of commutators and their significance in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of gamma matrices in detail, focusing on their anticommutation relations.
  • Learn about the Levi-Civita symbol and its applications in quantum mechanics and field theory.
  • Explore the implications of spin operators in quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to angular momentum.
  • Investigate the role of commutators in quantum mechanics and their impact on observable quantities.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum field theory, particularly those studying spin and angular momentum in particle physics.

vertices
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Sorry for spamming the forums, but one last question for today!

If

[tex]\Sigma^k=\frac{i}{2} \epsilon_{kij} [\gamma^i , \gamma^j][/tex]

where [A,B]=AB-BA

Why does [tex]{\Sigma^1=2i \gamma^2\gamma^3[/tex] (that's what my notes say, anyway)

I think it should equal:

[tex]\Sigma^1=\frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{123}[\gamma^2,\gamma^3] + \frac{i}{2}\epsilon_{132}[\gamma^3,\gamma^2][/tex]
[tex]= \frac{i}{2}(+1)}[\gamma^2,\gamma^3] + \frac{i}{2}(-1)(-[\gamma^2,\gamma^3])[/tex]
[tex]=i[\gamma^2,\gamma^3][/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Disregard that question - I've just worked it out. For anyone who's interested: it's because

[tex] =\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu = -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu [/tex]
 
vertices said:
Disregard that question - I've just worked it out. For anyone who's interested: it's because

[tex] =\gamma^\mu\gamma^\nu = -\gamma^\nu\gamma^\mu [/tex]
that is not true, it is only true for the "spatial" components, for the time component: gamma^0 gamma^0 = gamma^0 gamma^0 = 1
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K