Undergrad Understanding the null hypothesis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tyto alba
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistic
Click For Summary
The null hypothesis indicates no difference, association, or effect between variables, and its negation suggests the presence of these elements. The discussion highlights confusion regarding what specific differences, associations, or effects the null hypothesis refers to. It clarifies that differences pertain to the probability distributions of random variables, while association and effect relate to the relationships between these variables. The terms "association" and "effect" may not have a strict distinction, with "effect" often linked to continuous variables and "association" to categorical ones. Understanding these concepts is crucial for applying statistical analysis effectively.
Tyto alba
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I was reading Bio-statistics principles and practice by Antonisamy and stumbled upon the following:

Null hypothesis is a hypothesis that suggests an absence of difference, association or effect, the negation of which provides evidence for presence of difference, association or effect.

The only problem I'm facing with this definition is that it doesn't say-
  • differences between what,
  • association between what and
  • effect of what on what?
From random sources I know that a null hypothesis involve hypothesising that a theoretical distribution is consistent with an observed distribution, i.e. there is no difference. Also it can assume that there's no difference between the scores of two variables.

But I don't clearly understand what the book meant by association and effect?

I actually found this post in a different community where the OP is trying to establish a relationship (association) between driving speed and gender. Does the definition refer to such associations?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
SanjuktaGhosh said:
Null hypothesis is a hypothesis that suggests an absence of difference, association or effect, the negation of which provides evidence for presence of difference, association or effect.

The only problem I'm facing with this definition is that it doesn't say-
  • differences between what,
  • association between what and
  • effect of what on what?
Differences in this context refers to differences between the probability distributions of two or more random variables. Since the random variables are usually modeled as belonging to some parameterized probability distribution, this is equivalent to looking for differences in the parameters.

Association or effect just means some function that relates one random variable to another (or the parameters of one to the parameters of another). I don't think there is a real distinction between the two. Maybe "effect" is more associated with continuous random variables and "association" with categorical ones.
 
  • Like
Likes Tyto alba
Dale said:
Differences in this context refers to differences between the probability distributions of two or more random variables. Since the random variables are usually modeled as belonging to some parameterized probability distribution, this is equivalent to looking for differences in the parameters.

Association or effect just means some function that relates one random variable to another (or the parameters of one to the parameters of another). I don't think there is a real distinction between the two. Maybe "effect" is more associated with continuous random variables and "association" with categorical ones.

Oh thank you, that was a huge help.
 
Last edited:
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K