Undergrad Understanding the Role of Space Energy Propagator in Quantum Field Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the role of the space energy propagator, denoted as ##G^+(x, y, E)##, in Quantum Field Theory (QFT), specifically in the context of the textbook "QFT for the Gifted Amateur." The propagator is expressed in terms of energy eigenfunctions and is crucial for understanding the retarded Green's function. The relationship between the spacetime propagator ##G^+(x, t, x', t')## and its energy representation is established through Fourier transforms, highlighting the importance of the poles in the complex energy plane for defining the propagator's behavior. The discussion concludes that ##\tilde{G}(x, y, E)## serves as an essential tool for solving initial-value problems in the Schrödinger equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory concepts
  • Familiarity with energy eigenfunctions and the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of Fourier transforms in quantum mechanics
  • Basic grasp of Green's functions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of the retarded Green's function in QFT
  • Explore the role of energy eigenfunctions in solving the time-dependent Schrödinger equation
  • Learn about the significance of poles in complex analysis for propagators
  • Investigate the relationship between spacetime propagators and energy representations in QFT
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in advanced Quantum Field Theory concepts and their applications in solving physical problems.

PeroK
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2024 Award
Messages
29,412
Reaction score
21,112
TL;DR
What is the space energy propagator?
This is section 16.3 of QFT for the Gifted Amateur. I understand the concept of the spacetime propagator ##G^+(x, t, x', t')##, but the following propagator is introduced without any explanation I can see:
$$G^+(x, y, E) = \sum_n \frac{i\phi_n(x)\phi_n^*(y)}{E - E_n}$$
It would be good to have an explanation of what this is and what role it plays. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes JD_PM
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the representation of the "spacetime propagtor" in terms of energy eigenfunctions. It's quite easy to prove. I'd like to write ##\tilde{G}^+(x,y,E)##, because it's a different function than ##G^+(x,t,x',t')##. You have of course
$$G^+(x,t,x',t')=G^+(x,x',t-t'),$$
because obviously the textbook author considers a Hamiltonian that's not explicitly time dependent and thus the system is time-translation invariant. Then you have
$$G^+(x,t,x',t')=\int_{\mathbb{R}} \frac{\mathrm{d} E}{2 \pi} G^+(x,x',E) \exp[-\mathrm{i} E(t-t')]. \qquad (**)$$
Further I also guess that ##G^+## is the retarded propagator. It's necessary to know that, because the definition of ##\tilde{G}^+## is incomplete without telling, how to deal with the poles at ##E=E_n##. For the retarded propgator you get
$$\tilde{G}^{+}(x,y,E)=\sum_n \frac{\mathrm{i} \phi_n(x) \phi_n^*(y)}{E-E_n+\mathrm{i} 0^+}. \qquad (*)$$
Then you have
$$(\mathrm{i} \partial_t -\hat{H}) G^+(x,t,x',t') = \int_{\mathrm{R}} \frac{\mathrm{d} E}{2 \pi} \exp[-\mathrm{i} E (t-t')] [E-\hat{H}] \sum_n \frac{\mathrm{i} \phi_n(x) \phi_n(x')}{E-E_n + \mathrm{i} 0^+} =\int_{\mathrm{R}} \frac{\mathrm{d} E}{2 \pi} \exp[-\mathrm{i} E (t-t')] \sum_n \mathrm{i} \psi_n(x) \psi_n^*(x') = \mathrm{i} \delta(t-t') \delta^{(3)}(\vec{x}-\vec{x}').$$
In the last step I've used the completeness of the energy eigenbasis.

With the choice of the regularization of the poles given (*), ##G^+## is choosen to be the retarded Green's function, i.e.,
$$G^+(x,t,x',t') \propto \Theta(t-t'),$$
as one can see, when taking the Fourier integral in (**) by closing the integration path in the complex energy plane with a large circle. For ##t-t'>0## you have to close the circle in the lower plane, including all the poles. So there you get some non-zero value, but for ##t-t'<0## you have to close the contour in the upper plane, and this gives 0, because there are no poles in the upper plane (thanks to the ##+\mathrm{i} 0^+## in the denominator). For ##t-t'<0## you can solve the integral very easily using the Theorem of Residues, leading finally to
$$G^+(x,t,x',t')=\Theta(t-t') \sum_{n} \phi_n(x) \phi_n^*(x') \exp[-\mathrm{i} E_n(t-t')].$$
Using ##\partial_t \Theta(t-t')=\delta(t-t')## it's easy to show again that this is indeed the retarded Green's function using the completeness of the energy eigenbasis.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes JD_PM and PeroK
Thanks. So, to summarise: ##\tilde G(x, y, E)## is the Fourier transform of ##G(x, y, t)##.

Where would you use ##\tilde G(x, y, E)##? Is it an intermediate stepping stone to get to ##G(p, E)##?
 
It's always useful, if you have solved the energy eigenvalueproblem (i.e., the time-dependent Schrödinger equation). Then you can use it to describe arbitrary initial-value problems for the Schrödinger equation by expanding the solution in energy eigenfunctions.
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K