Understanding Truss Analysis: Investigating the Accuracy of a Bridge Design App

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the accuracy of the bridge design applet found at http://pages.jh.edu/~virtlab/bridge/truss.htm, particularly regarding its handling of truss analysis. Users report that the app generates excessively high force values, such as a 200 load resulting in forces exceeding 500 in multiple members. The software appears to utilize matrix truss analysis, which may not accurately handle complex or asymmetrically applied loads. Users are advised to compare results with established textbook examples and consider alternative applications for more reliable analysis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of truss analysis using the method of joints
  • Familiarity with matrix truss analysis techniques
  • Basic knowledge of statics in structural engineering
  • Experience with bridge design principles
NEXT STEPS
  • Research matrix truss analysis techniques in detail
  • Explore alternative bridge design applications with better accuracy
  • Study examples of truss designs in structural engineering textbooks
  • Learn about the effects of asymmetrically applied loads on truss structures
USEFUL FOR

High school educators, students participating in bridge design contests, structural engineers, and anyone interested in the accuracy of truss analysis software.

mishima
Messages
576
Reaction score
43
Hi, my high school students enjoy using the applet found here (http://pages.jh.edu/~virtlab/bridge/truss.htm) to design model (basswood) bridges for our annual regional contest. It seems to require firefox these days.

Recently, some designs have been causing extremely large forces to be reported. For example, a 200 load causing forces of 500+ in multiple members. A screenshot of the design which causes this is below.

bridge.jpg


So naturally both myself and my students are curious why some designs cause this. I am familiar with truss analysis using the method of joints, but the software appears to use some kind of matrix to do the calculations all at once. I was wondering if anyone had insight into how this software might do its calculations.

My guess is that it can only accurately handle simple trusses.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mishima said:
Hi, my high school students enjoy using the applet found here (http://pages.jh.edu/~virtlab/bridge/truss.htm) to design model (basswood) bridges for our annual regional contest. It seems to require firefox these days.

Recently, some designs have been causing extremely large forces to be reported. For example, a 200 load causing forces of 500+ in multiple members. A screenshot of the design which causes this is below.

bridge.jpg


So naturally both myself and my students are curious why some designs cause this. I am familiar with truss analysis using the method of joints, but the software appears to use some kind of matrix to do the calculations all at once. I was wondering if anyone had insight into how this software might do its calculations.

My guess is that it can only accurately handle simple trusses.
Matrix truss analysis is a proven technique. If you have concerns about this particular app., there should be some sample trusses that you can find in a textbook or on the web which has results that you can compare to an analysis of the same structure performed by this app.

After you obtain results, you can still use statics to check them if you question whether they are correct.
 
Well, here is more extreme example showing a 100 load magically amplified into the billions by the same truss. There seems to be some prerequisites to the technique that we are unintentionally breaking.

trussd.jpg
 
Whatever this app is doing, it can't handle asymmetrically applied loads. It also has a peculiar requirement for the number of members a structure must have given a fixed number of nodes.

I recommend you find another app which doesn't have the problems this one has.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
5K