Understanding Truss Mechanics: Why Use the Ratio 40/41 and Y Distance of 6.3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter garr6120
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mechanics Truss
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on the mechanics of trusses, specifically addressing the calculation of forces in member AB. Participants explore the use of the ratio 40/41 and the significance of a y distance of 6.3 ft in their calculations, while also referencing a given distance of 9 ft. The conversation includes technical reasoning and calculations related to moments and angles in the context of truss analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion regarding the use of the ratio 40/41 and the y distance of 6.3 ft, questioning why a ratio of 4/5 is not used instead.
  • One participant asserts that the length of AD must be 41 ft based on the Pythagorean Theorem, leading to the conclusion that the tangent of the angle is 40/41.
  • Another participant calculates the sum of moments around point G and arrives at a force of 9.33 kN for member AB, while noting that the expected answer is 8.20 kN, prompting questions about their approach.
  • There is a discussion about the moment arm of AB being the perpendicular distance to point G, with differing interpretations of how to calculate this distance.
  • One participant suggests that the sine, rather than the tangent, is relevant in their calculations, indicating a potential misunderstanding in earlier posts.
  • Another participant questions the interpretation of the length in the x direction, suggesting it should be 12 ft instead of 40 ft, indicating uncertainty about the moment calculations.
  • Participants explore multiple methods to calculate the moment arm and angles, indicating that there may be various valid approaches to the problem.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the correct ratios and distances to use in their calculations, indicating that there is no consensus on the approach to solving the problem. Multiple competing interpretations of the mechanics involved remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include unclear assumptions regarding the geometry of the truss, the definitions of distances used, and the specific calculations that lead to different conclusions about the forces in member AB.

garr6120
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Given the diagram in the file. I am trying to find the force for the member AB and I do not understand why they use the ratio 40/41 and why they are using 6.3 as the y distance because we have 9ft given and we use the ratio 4/5 instead of 40/41.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-12-03 at 5.11.47 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-12-03 at 5.11.47 PM.png
    50.7 KB · Views: 856
Engineering news on Phys.org
garr6120 said:
Given the diagram in the file. I am trying to find the force for the member AB and I do not understand why they use the ratio 40/41 and why they are using 6.3 as the y distance because we have 9ft given and we use the ratio 4/5 instead of 40/41.
You haven't shown any of the calculations, but it's immediately clear that the length of AD must by 41 ft because of the Pythagorean Theorem. Therefore, the tangent of the angle is 40/41. Presumably this is relevant.
 
Mapes said:
You haven't shown any of the calculations, but it's immediately clear that the length of AD must by 41 ft because of the Pythagorean Theorem. Therefore, the tangent of the angle is 40/41. Presumably this is relevant.

Sorry I should of shown them my bad. I calculated: the sum of moments around G. which is equal to -1.8kips(14ft)-0.9kips(28ft+(9/15(Fab))(9ft)
solving for the Fab I get a force of 9.33kN however the answer is 8.20kN and they use a ratio of 40/41 times 6.3 ft. I was wondering how to approach this problem and what am I doing wrong. Isn't the moment of Fab 9ft above G?
 
garr6120 said:
Sorry I should of shown them my bad. I calculated: the sum of moments around G. which is equal to -1.8kips(14ft)-0.9kips(28ft+(9/15(Fab))(9ft)
solving for the Fab I get a force of 9.33kN however the answer is 8.20kN and they use a ratio of 40/41 times 6.3 ft. I was wondering how to approach this problem and what am I doing wrong. Isn't the moment of Fab 9ft above G?
Ah, got it. Good identification of the correct free-body diagram to use! But the moment arm of AB is the perpendicular distance to G. The way I'd calculate it is to say that the cosine of the far right angle is d / 28 ft (where d is the moment arm) and that the cosine is also 9 ft / 41 ft from the larger triangle. (Note that the first hypotenuse is on the bottom; the second is on the top.) This gives the same answer. There are probably a few ways to work it out; it would be good practice to try to find another way.

EDIT: Sorry, earlier I should have written that the sine, not the tangent, is 40/41.
 
I have a question though I understand that AB is the perpendicular distance above G therefore you cannot find a moment using the length of AB in the x direction. However, I am still confused about the length in x being 40 from G shouldn't the length be 12ft. Am I thinking about Moments wrong?
 
I'm not sure what you mean when you say "the length in x being 40 from G". You may be referring to a calculation that I don't see. The moment arm of AB around point G is shown below. There are multiple ways to find this distance; the approach I took was to first find angle CDH, whose tangent is 9 ft / 40 ft. Then I used the fact that the sine of the angle is d / 28 ft, where d is the perpendicular distance from AB to G.
upload_2016-12-4_9-32-25.png
 

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K