Unique set of vectors normal to a hyperplane

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bipolarity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Normal Set Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the point-normal representation of hyperplanes in ℝ^{n} and the conversion from component-wise representation to point-normal representation. It establishes that a hyperplane defined by the equation a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b has normal vectors of the form t where t is a scalar. The identity = t is highlighted as a crucial tool for demonstrating the relationship between these representations in inner product spaces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of point-normal representation in vector spaces
  • Familiarity with inner product spaces and their properties
  • Knowledge of affine spaces and hyperplanes in ℝ^{n}
  • Basic algebraic manipulation of vector equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner product spaces and their applications
  • Explore the derivation of hyperplane equations from geometric principles
  • Learn about vector projections and their relevance to normal vectors
  • Investigate the implications of scalar multiplication in vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in geometric interpretations of vector spaces and hyperplanes.

Bipolarity
Messages
773
Reaction score
2
Let's say we have a point-normal representation of a space:
[tex]n \cdot P_{0}P = 0[/tex] where n is a vector [itex]<a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}>[/itex] and [itex]P_{0}[/itex] is a point through which the space passes and P is the set of all points contained in the space.

In [itex]ℝ^{2}[/itex], the point-normal representation defines a line.
In [itex]ℝ^{3}[/itex], the point-normal representation defines a plane.
In [itex]ℝ^{n}[/itex], the point-normal representation defines a hyperplane, or (n-1) dimensional affine space.

It can be shown that this affine space can be represented in component form as:
[tex]a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b[/tex]
where b is a constant.

My question is essentially asking about the converse of the representation done above: Can we go from the component-wise representation to the point-normal representation?
In other words, can we show that the only vectors normal to the space determined by [tex]a_{1}x_{1} + a_{2}x_{2} + ... + a_{n}x_{n} = b[/tex] are vectors of the form
[itex]t<a_{1},a_{2}...a_{n}>[/itex] where t is a scalar parameter?

BiP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Bipolarity.

You could use the identity that <tx,y> = t<x,y> for general inner products and if <x,y> = 0 then <tx,y> = t<x,y> = 0 for all x and y in the inner product space.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K