Uniqueness and Existence Theorm

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Aldnoahz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Existence Uniqueness
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the uniqueness and existence theorem in the context of the differential equation y' = 1/sqrt(y). It is established that the theorem guarantees uniqueness of solutions only in regions where y' and dy'/dy are continuous, specifically for y > 0. The participants clarify that substituting initial conditions such as y(c) = 0 is invalid, as the function does not satisfy the differential equation at that point. Consequently, while there may be unique solutions derived from the general solution, the uniqueness theorem does not apply outside the defined continuous region.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their solutions
  • Familiarity with the uniqueness and existence theorem
  • Knowledge of continuity in mathematical functions
  • Basic concepts of Taylor series and convergence
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the uniqueness and existence theorem in detail
  • Explore the implications of continuity in differential equations
  • Learn about the behavior of solutions near singular points
  • Investigate Taylor series expansions and their convergence properties
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential equations, and anyone interested in the theoretical aspects of mathematical analysis and solution behavior.

Aldnoahz
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Consider y' = 1/sqrt(y)

I seem to be able to find a unique solution given the initial condition of the form y(c) = 0, but the theorem says I won't be able to do so, so I am kind of confused.

I just want some clarifications. Does the uniqueness and existence theorem say anything about the region outside the rectangle where y' and dy'/dy is continuous? Say in this example the theorem guarantees uniqueness when y > 0, but does it necessarily mean that when y = 0, there is no unique solution (i.e. you always find multiple solutions)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot plug in y(c) = 0 in the formula - the function cannot satisfy the differential equation there. You cannot apply a theorem using a differential equation in a region where this equation is not valid.
 
In this case, it appears the uniqueness theorem doesn't guarantee anything. There may be a unique solution, but from the uniqueness theorem you can not determine whether this is the case or not.
 
Charles Link said:
In this case, it appears the uniqueness theorem doesn't guarantee anything. There may be a unique solution, but from the uniqueness theorem you can not determine whether this is the case or not.

If I understand correctly, uniqueness and existence theorem only guarantees solutions in the region where y' and dy'/dy are continuous, so initial conditions outside this region may or may not result in multiple solutions?
 
mfb said:
You cannot plug in y(c) = 0 in the formula - the function cannot satisfy the differential equation there. You cannot apply a theorem using a differential equation in a region where this equation is not valid.

I see that the only reason we cannot substitute in y(c) = 0 as the solution is that y' goes to infinity as y approaches 0? But that only means the tangent at y = 0 tends to a vertical line. If I directly solve it and find the general solution, they still give me unique solutions that don't cross each other...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link
You need an applicable initial condition for a unique solution. y(c)=d for d>0 for example.
 
Aldnoahz said:
I see that the only reason we cannot substitute in y(c) = 0 as the solution is that y' goes to infinity as y approaches 0? But that only means the tangent at y = 0 tends to a vertical line. If I directly solve it and find the general solution, they still give me unique solutions that don't cross each other...
This reminds me of a similar problem that results when you do a Taylor expansion of ## ln(1+x) ## about ## x=0 ##. Because ## x=-1 ## clearly will diverge, the circle of convergence of this series in the complex plane has ## r=1 ##. However, if you use ## x=1 ## you do get a converging series for ## ln(2)=1-1/2+1/3-1/4... ##.
 
Actually it is easy to give sense to the original question. Just reformulate it for the system
$$\dot x=\sqrt y,\quad \dot y= 1$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
685
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K