Unitarity of Time-evolution Operator

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kiwakwok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator Unitarity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the unitary requirement of the time-evolution operator U(t,t_0) in quantum mechanics and its connection to probability conservation. Participants explore the implications of this requirement, referencing Wigner's theorem and various quantum mechanics texts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks to understand how the unitary property of U(t,t_0) leads to the conservation of probability, specifically the equality of sums of squared coefficients at different times.
  • Another participant references Wigner's theorem, suggesting that the discussion of the unitary requirement is typically found in texts addressing symmetries in quantum theory.
  • A participant provides a mathematical argument showing that the inner product remains normalized under the action of the unitary operator, implying probability conservation.
  • Another participant notes that the notation "c_a's" refers to Fourier coefficients, and discusses the implications of Wigner's theorem regarding the nature of U as either linear and unitary or antilinear and antiunitary.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding and interpretation of the unitary requirement and its implications. There is no clear consensus on the best approach to demonstrate the connection to probability conservation, and multiple viewpoints regarding the nature of the time-evolution operator are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants reference specific texts and theorems, indicating that their arguments may depend on particular definitions or interpretations within quantum mechanics. The discussion includes mathematical expressions that may require further clarification or context.

kiwakwok
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
I am reading a quantum mechanics book. I did not clearly understand one particular idea.

When the book talks about the time-evolution operator U(t,t_0), it says that one very important property is the unitary requirement for U(t,t_0) that follows from probability conservation.

My question is, provided that the time-evoluation operator U(t,t_0) satisfies the unitary requirement, that is, U(t,t_0)^{\dagger}U(t,t_0)=\mathbb{1}, how can I see and then proof explicitly that it indeed follows from probability conservation, that is, \sum_{a'}\left|c_{a'}(t_0)\right|^2=\sum_{a'}\left|c_{a'}(t)\right|^2?

Thanks in advance for giving me a helping hand.

Reference: P.67, Modern Quantum Mechanics by Sakurai.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is typically contained in the discussion of the Wigner's theorem in textbooks treating symmetries in Quantum Theory. Look up this subject in the book by Fonda and Ghirardi (1970).
 
kiwakwok said:
My question is, provided that the time-evoluation operator U(t,t_0) satisfies the unitary requirement, that is, U(t,t_0)^{\dagger}U(t,t_0)=\mathbb{1}, how can I see and then proof explicitly that it indeed follows from probability conservation, that is, \sum_{a'}\left|c_{a'}(t_0)\right|^2=\sum_{a'}\left|c_{a'}(t)\right|^2?

I don't know what you're ca's are, but the general idea is the following

\langle \psi|\psi\rangle = 1\;\Rightarrow\;\langle \psi,t|\psi,t\rangle = <br /> \langle U\psi|U\psi\rangle = ( \langle \psi|U^\dagger)\,(U|\psi \rangle ) = \langle \psi|(U^\dagger\,U)|\psi \rangle = \langle \psi|\psi\rangle = 1
 
I read few pages of the book by Fonda and simply ensure that I am really understand.

Quote:
--- --- --- --- ---
Wigner's Theorem
Suppose that we have chosen a particular one-to-one vector mapping T compatible with \mathbf{T}, of the coherent subspace \mathcal{H}_c onto the coherent subspace \mathcal{H}_c, satisfying then \left|\left(T\psi,T\phi\right)\right|=\left|(\psi,\phi)\right|
--- --- --- --- ---

From the conservation of probability, that is {\left|\left(U\psi,U\phi\right)\right|}^{2}=\left|(\psi,\phi)\right|^2, according to the Wigner's theorem we obtain that ray mapping \mathbf{T} can be realized by a linear unitary vector mapping U.
 
tom.stoer said:
I don't know what you're ca's are, but the general idea is the following

\langle \psi|\psi\rangle = 1\;\Rightarrow\;\langle \psi,t|\psi,t\rangle = <br /> \langle U\psi|U\psi\rangle = ( \langle \psi|U^\dagger)\,(U|\psi \rangle ) = \langle \psi|(U^\dagger\,U)|\psi \rangle = \langle \psi|\psi\rangle = 1

Nice. Thanks.
 
The c_a's are the typical notation for the Fourier coefficients.

From the Wigner theorem you get that the U's can be either linear and unitary or antilinear and antiunitary. Since time evolution is a continuous process/symmetry, it follows that the operators must be unitary.
 
dextercioby and tom.stoer, thanks very much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K