Unitary operator acting on state

  • Thread starter Thread starter copernicus1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operator State
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the action of the unitary operator U(Λ) on states defined covariantly, specifically examining whether it affects the factor of √(2E_p) in the state |p⟩. It is clarified that U(Λ) is linear and does not alter numerical factors, only states and operators. The covariant state |p⟩ is expressed as √(2E_p)a_p†|0⟩, and the transformation under U(Λ) leads to U(Λ)|p⟩ = √(2E_Λp)U(Λ)a_p†|0⟩. Therefore, while the operator acts on the state, the factor √(2E_p) does change to √(2E_Λp). The conclusion confirms that the unitary operator does indeed affect the energy factor in the covariant state representation.
copernicus1
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
In the operation $$U(\Lambda)|{\bf p}\rangle=|{\Lambda\bf p}\rangle,$$ if we define the state covariantly, $$|{\bf p}\rangle=\sqrt{2E_{\bf p}}a_{\bf p}^\dagger|0\rangle,$$ then does the unitary operator U(\Lambda) affect the factor of \sqrt{2E_{\bf p}}? In other words, can we write $$U(\Lambda)|{\bf p}\rangle=U(\Lambda)\sqrt{2E_{\bf p}}a_{\bf p}^\dagger|0\rangle=\sqrt{2E_{\Lambda\bf p}}U(\Lambda)a_{\bf p}^\dagger|0\rangle,$$ or does \sqrt{2E_{\bf p}} remain unaffected?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The unitary operator is linear and so cannot "affect" numbers, only states (and operators).
 
copernicus1 said:
if we define the state covariantly, $$|{\bf p}\rangle=\sqrt{2E_{\bf p}}a_{\bf p}^\dagger|0\rangle,$$ then does the unitary operator U(\Lambda) affect the factor of \sqrt{2E_{\bf p}}?
Yes. As you say, the covariant states are created by the covariant form of the creation operator, namely b_{\bf p}^\dagger = \sqrt{2E_{\bf p}}a_{\bf p}, and U(\Lambda)b_{\bf p}^\dagger U(\Lambda)^{-1}= b_{\bf \Lambda p}^\dagger
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K