Universal Gravitation problem - Satellite Orbit

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
Thewindyfan
Messages
68
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement


http://prntscr.com/9huihp
Given,
Mass of the Earth = 6*1024
Mass of Satellite = 45 kg
Radius of Satellite's orbit = 4.2*107
G = 6.67*10-11
Find the velocity of the satellite.

Homework Equations


Gravitational Force Fg = (G*Me*Ms)/(Rs2)
Newton's second law:
Fg = Ms*a where a = v2/Rs due to uniform circular motion.

The Attempt at a Solution


http://prntscr.com/9huloh
http://prntscr.com/9hulwt

I feel like I'm being thrown off either by the units being in km/s or by not accounting for the fact that the acceleration vector points in the -x direction, but I don't see why that would affect the magnitude of the velocity. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to what I may be neglecting, because these problems are usually pretty easy for me.
*ps. sorry if my writing is not legible enough to read!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thewindyfan said:

Homework Statement


http://prntscr.com/9huihp
Given,
Mass of the Earth = 6*1024
Mass of Satellite = 45 kg
Radius of Satellite's orbit = 4.2*107
G = 6.67*10-11
Find the velocity of the satellite.

Homework Equations


Gravitational Force Fg = (G*Me*Ms)/(Rs2)
Newton's second law:
Fg = Ms*a where a = v2/Rs due to uniform circular motion.

The Attempt at a Solution


http://prntscr.com/9huloh
http://prntscr.com/9hulwt

I feel like I'm being thrown off either by the units being in km/s or by not accounting for the fact that the acceleration vector points in the -x direction, but I don't see why that would affect the magnitude of the velocity. Can anyone point me in the right direction as to what I may be neglecting, because these problems are usually pretty easy for me.
*ps. sorry if my writing is not legible enough to read!
Well, you have the correct formula for the orbital speed of the satellite. Did you check your arithmetic? That's a good place to start.

I checked your calculations, and I come up with a different result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Thewindyfan
SteamKing said:
Well, you have the correct formula for the orbital speed of the satellite. Did you check your arithmetic? That's a good place to start.

I checked your calculations, and I come up with a different result.
WOW.

Last time I did this problem I remembered making sure to take the square root of my answer but I still ended up not getting the correct answer, but now I did. Forgot to do the last step! Thank you.
 
Hi windyfan:

Thewindyfan said:
*ps. sorry if my writing is not legible enough to read!
I confess that I do have trouble with the illegibility.

Re http://prntscr.com/9huloh
The equation that you derive looks OK.

Re http://prntscr.com/9hulwt
There is a need to keep track of units. I can't tell if you are doing that right or not since you don't include the units in your work. You are also not mentioning in section (1) the units for G and Rs. I suggest you do the work again writing all the units for each expression.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Buzz Bloom said:
Hi windyfan:I confess that I do have trouble with the illegibility.

Re http://prntscr.com/9huloh
The equation that you derive looks OK.

Re http://prntscr.com/9hulwt
There is a need to keep track of units. I can't tell if you are doing that right or not since you don't include the units in your work. You are also not mentioning in section (1) the units for G and Rs. I suggest you do the work again writing all the units for each expression.

Hope this helps.

Regards,
Buzz
Thank you, because I realized it was because of the unorganized way I did my work that I forgot to complete the arithmetic!

This thread can be closed. Thank you guys for pointing my errors out!