Universal gravitation’s problem -- Balancing gravitational forces from 2 masses

  • Thread starter Thread starter Riccardo Finessi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universal gravitation
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on balancing gravitational forces between two masses using the universal gravitation formula. Participants clarify the meaning of variables in the equations, particularly "t," which is identified as time. They emphasize the importance of presenting work clearly, preferably using LaTeX instead of images, to enhance understanding. Key equations are provided to illustrate the relationships between the masses and gravitational forces. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for clear communication in solving physics problems related to gravitation.
Riccardo Finessi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
I have this problem that I’ll must have done for tomorrow but I can’t figure it out, I have done an attempt but dosean’t take anywhere, can anyone help me figure it out


Two particles are on the x-axis. Particle 1 has mass m and is at the origin of the axis, while particle 2 has mass 2m and its position is x = +L. Between these two particles there is a third particle.
At what position on the x-axis would the third particle have to be for the magnitude of the gravitational attractive force acting on both particles 1 and 2 to double? Express your answer in terms of L.


result:0,414L
Relevant Equations
F=G m1 m2 / d*2
IMG_0104.jpeg
IMG_0103.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

What is "t" in your equations? Time?
 
Welcome to PF!

When posting your work, we ask that you type your work (using Latex if possible), rather than posting images of your work. More guidelines for posting questions about homework problems can be found here.

It's a little hard to follow your work in the image. There are no words to describe your train of thought. However, I think your work is ok up to the following

1715622246482.png
 
With a small sketch things become easier:

1715645968120.png

In number 1 you have $$
F={G\,m_1m_2\over L^2}
$$so in number 2 you want $$
{G\,m_1m_3\over x^2L^2}={G\,m_1m_2\over L^2}\quad\Rightarrow \quad
m_2 = {m_3\over x^2} \quad \Rightarrow \quad m_1 = {m_3\over 2x^2}
$$Then in number 3 you require $$
{G\,m_2m_3\over (1-x^2)L^2} = {G\,m_1m_2\over L^2}\quad\Rightarrow \quad m_1 = {m_3\over (1-x)^2}
$$this way it's easy to see your
1715687608177.png
was still correct, as @TSny replied.

##\ ##
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K