Unmasking a Pseudoscience: The Tachyon Detector

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around skepticism regarding the validity of a "tachyon detector" presented on a website, which is deemed pseudoscience. Participants express disbelief that simple electronic components could detect tachyons, particles theorized to travel faster than light, especially when advanced scientific instruments have not succeeded in this. The concept of tachyons involves complex theories, including string theory, but their detection using ordinary electronics is considered implausible. The conversation touches on the nature of tachyons, suggesting they would possess imaginary mass, allowing them to exceed light speed, yet would not exhibit conventional properties like mass or charge. Critics also highlight the superficial understanding of physics reflected in the claims made on the website, indicating a broader concern about the proliferation of unscientific ideas in theoretical science.
juan avellaneda
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
some time ago i found this information

http://www.spots.ab.ca/~belfroy/tachyonDetector.html

on internet about a supposed "tachyon detector " . I have to confess that i believe this junk until a more deep study of electronics and amplificators led me to conclude that this is only a simple 3 stage amplificator

is ridiculous and funny to think now how some pieces of transistors, capacitors and resistance could detect something that even the most powerful and advanced scientific instruments ever constructed couldn't have done yet

this is definitively pseudoscience

someone knows who is this misterious professor Shinichi Seike, or about that whacky G research institute, or know something about the "principles of ultrarelativity" ?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I never made it past the opening sentence...

"A tachyon particle if it exists as a particle that can travel faster than the speed of light. It may have a mass and size smaller than that of a light photon"

Assuming a photon is massless, it appears we are talking negative mass here. That is a pretty thoroughly discredited concept.
 
Chronos said:
I never made it past the opening sentence...

"A tachyon particle if it exists as a particle that can travel faster than the speed of light. It may have a mass and size smaller than that of a light photon"

Assuming a photon is massless, it appears we are talking negative mass here. That is a pretty thoroughly discredited concept.


Tachyons are a standard feature of some string physics, where it is sometimes possible for physical interactions to turn them into physical particles. But to detect them with ordinary electronics is just silly.
 
Good point. I may have issues with theories that make no testable predictions.. er, isn't that called string theory?
 
Hi,

I think that if tachyon particles exist, they would be massless bundles of energy/momentum, without any electromagnetic, weak, strong, or gravitational properties. They would be detectable only by their transfer of energy/momentum to a suitable detector.

juju
 
juju said:
Hi,

I think that if tachyon particles exist, they would be massless bundles of energy/momentum, without any electromagnetic, weak, strong, or gravitational properties. They would be detectable only by their transfer of energy/momentum to a suitable detector.

juju

They can't be massless, because the thing that allows them to travel faster than light is their imaginary mass, m2 < 0. If they were massless, they would just travel at c, like the photon.
 
also ridiculous is what this guy has at the bottom of some of his other web pages
Some of the internet pages generate temporary arrays the help clear some of your random access memory from possible internet attacks that may have come in with the downloads. You can maximize your security settings on Netscape 6.2, encrypt Netscape 6.2 with Windows XP, store Netscape 6.2 in your own folder and set your magnetic hard disk on "hidden" mode to help protect your computer.
after browsing through some of his "theoretical science" writings, they all seem fairly characteristic of those with a very superificial understanding of physics trying to come up with "revolutionary ideas"...crackpots
 
Last edited:
z

selfAdjoint said:
They can't be massless, because the thing that allows them to travel faster than light is their imaginary mass, m2 < 0. If they were massless, they would just travel at c, like the photon.

It may be that being just bundles of energy/momentum. they are not subject to the same constraints as other massless particles.

Also, if a particle had an imaginary mass, wouldn't that imply that its world lines would be perpendicular to normal space.

juju
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K