Updated Hubble constant from TRGB measurements

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent preprint by Scolnic et al. presents an updated measurement of the Hubble constant (H0) at 73.22±2.06 km/s/Mpc, derived from the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) method and analyzed using the Comparative Analysis of TRGBs (CATS) algorithm. This study addresses the complexities of TRGB measurements, particularly the edge-detection response (EDR) challenges, and incorporates an expanded sample of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) hosts. The findings indicate that previous TRGB determinations were lower due to unaccounted corrections for supernova survey differences and local flows, which contribute approximately 2.0 km/s/Mpc to the variance in H0 measurements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) method
  • Familiarity with Comparative Analysis of TRGBs (CATS) algorithm
  • Knowledge of Type Ia supernova (SN Ia) measurements
  • Basic concepts of distance ladders in cosmology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodology of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) for distance measurement
  • Explore the Comparative Analysis of TRGBs (CATS) algorithm and its applications
  • Investigate the implications of the Pantheon+ SN Ia sample on cosmological measurements
  • Study the effects of local flows and survey differences on Hubble constant calculations
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, and researchers involved in measuring cosmic distances and understanding the expansion of the universe will benefit from this discussion.

member 673059
Scolnic et al have put out a new preprint with an updated value for the Hubble constant as measured from the Tip of the Red Giant Branch:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.06693
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bandersnatch and vanhees71
Space news on Phys.org

CATS: The Hubble Constant from Standardized TRGB and Type Ia Supernova Measurements​

D. Scolnic, A. G. Riess, J. Wu, S. Li, G. S. Anand, R. Beaton, S. Casertano, R. Anderson, S. Dhawan, X. Ke
The Tip of the Red Giant Branch (TRGB) provides a luminous standard candle for constructing distance ladders to measure the Hubble constant. In practice its measurements via edge-detection response (EDR) are complicated by the apparent fuzziness of the tip and the multi-peak landscape of the EDR. As a result, it can be difficult to replicate due to a case-by-case measurement process.

Previously we optimized an unsupervised algorithm, Comparative Analysis of TRGBs (CATs), to minimize the variance among multiple halo fields per host without reliance on individualized choices, achieving state-of-the-art ∼ < 0.05 mag distance measures for optimal data.

Further, we found an empirical correlation at 5σ confidence in the GHOSTS halo survey between our measurements of the tip and their contrast ratios (ratio of stars 0.5 mag just below and above the tip), useful for standardizing the apparent tips at different host locations.

Here, we apply this algorithm to an expanded sample of SN Ia hosts to standardize these to multiple fields in the geometric anchor, NGC 4258.

In concert with the Pantheon+ SN Ia sample, this analysis produces a (baseline) result of H0=73.22±2.06 km/s/Mpc. The largest difference in H0 between this and similar studies employing the TRGB derives from corrections for SN survey differences and local flows used in most recent SN Ia compilations but which were absent in earlier studies. SN-related differences total ∼ 2.0 km/s/Mpc. A smaller share, ∼ 1.4 km/s/Mpc, results from the inhomogeneity of the TRGB calibration across the distance ladder.

We employ a grid of 108 variants around the optimal TRGB algorithm and find the median of variants is 72.94±1.98 km/s/Mpc with an additional uncertainty due to algorithm choices of 0.83 km/s/Mpc. None of these TRGB variants result in H0 less than 71.6 km/s/Mpc.
Comments:Submitted to ApJL, comments welcome
 
That's quite a bit northwards of previous TRGB determinations:
1683752081302.png

(Freedman et al. 2019; fig.17)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
pinball1970 said:
Not sure I get why there would be more than one image separated by time.
The light from the supernova follows different paths around the lensing galaxy cluster. Some paths are longer than others, so it takes correspondingly more or less time. Imagine a light beam going straight to you, and another making a detour - it'd normally leave the source in a direction unaligned with the observer, but the gravity well bends its path so that it turns around towards you. The turning around takes some time, so to speak.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: CalcNerd, ohwilleke and pinball1970

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K