Undergrad Usage of First Order Elastic Constants in Soft Body Equations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the application of first order elastic constants in soft body equations, specifically referencing the work of J.T. Oden in "Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua." The user seeks to extract specific constants from a 6x6 elastic tensor matrix for the material Nb4CoSi, as provided by the Materials Project Database. The conversation highlights the confusion between first order and fourth order elasticity, clarifying that the first order refers to linear factors in the expansion, while fourth order involves tensors with four indices. The user is exploring the implications of symmetry relations in the context of their constitutive equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of first order and fourth order elasticity concepts
  • Familiarity with tensor notation and symmetry relations in elasticity
  • Knowledge of constitutive equations for elastic anisotropic materials
  • Experience with finite element analysis and soft body simulations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the tutorial "An In-Depth Tutorial on Constitutive Equations for Elastic Anisotropic Materials" by Michael Nemeth
  • Learn about the extraction and application of elastic constants from tensor matrices
  • Research the implications of symmetry in elasticity, particularly in relation to the Cauchy stress tensor
  • Explore advanced finite element analysis techniques for simulating soft body dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students in materials science and mechanical engineering focusing on soft body dynamics, elasticity, and finite element analysis.

doenn1616
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Trying to properly index elastic constants in elasticity equations.
Hi, I have some soft body equations that require first order elasticity constants. Just trying to figure out the proper indexing.

From Finite Elements of Nonlinear Continua by J.T. Oden, the elastic constants I am trying to obtain are the first order, circled below:

1640307271734.png

My particular constitutive equation doesn't need the zeroeth order, just first (circled in blue) or higher. I have a quite lengthy tutorial from Nasa on elastic constants called An In-Depth Tutorial on Constitutive Equations for Elastic Anisotropic Materials by Michael Nemeth, which includes:
1640307140508.png

So, say I need the constant at index 2,1,3,2. I see that in the full matrix only, circled below in blue:

1640307750435.png


I see there is symmetry, but can't figure out yet how to get this one. From the Materials Project Database, I have some elasticities of a material
Nb4CoSi:

"elastic_tensor": [
[
311.33514638650246,
144.45092552856926,
126.17558149507941,
0.0,
-0.11034746666666635,
0.0
],
[
144.45092552856926,
311.3204320131957,
126.16885826858503,
0.0,
-0.11216067833333321,
0.0
],
[
126.17558149507941,
126.16885826858503,
332.18500448217554,
0.0,
-0.10754095333333334,
0.0
],
[
0.0,
0.0,
0.0,
98.91818763333335,
0.0,
0.0
],
[
-0.11034746666666635,
-0.11216067833333321,
-0.10754095333333334,
0.0,
98.92097952333339,
0.0
],
[
0.0,
0.0,
0.0,
0.0,
0.0,
103.33913232000003
]
],

Which is only a 6x6 matrix. Is there something simple I can do to use these constants? Am I confined to a lower order? Confusing since Eijmn looks fourth order when Oden says first. Am I close or is there a lot more to do?

Regards.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In view of the symmetry relations C_{2132} = C_{1223}. Since \sigma_{ij} and \epsilon_{ij} are symmetric they each have only six independent entries, which can be related to each other by a 6x6 matrix.
 
doenn1616 said:
Confusing since Eijmn looks fourth order when Oden says first.

Distinguish
“first order” as “one factor of \gamma in the expansion” (“linear in \gamma”)
from
“fourth order” or “fourth rank” as “four indices” in that E-tensor (as a multilinear mapping of four vectors to the reals).
 
Yeah, yeah, you're totally right.. where is my mind at!

So,
1640633379432.png

C2132 = C1232 = C1223 and Eijmn also equals Ejinm.
1640633965516.png

Since Ejinm wasn't specified, just wanted to double check. And sorry for the delay, want to be thorough in proving these symmetries check out, but my mind is super full trying to simulate this and some fluid equations graphically, kind of digesting this slow this week. Take care..!
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...