Using Equations for Linear Motion at Constant Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miike012
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 1K views
Miike012
Messages
1,009
Reaction score
0
When would I use the following equations?

x=x(initial) + V*t

V(av) = 1/2( V(initial) + V)

These equations are used for objects moving in a linear motion at constant acceleration correct?

my book says that I will most likely use the following equations...


but why are the two above equation not important?
 

Attachments

  • aaaa.jpg
    aaaa.jpg
    6.2 KB · Views: 448
Physics news on Phys.org
Miike012 said:
When would I use the following equations?

x=x(initial) + V*t
This one's for constant velocity motion. Note that it's a special case of the second equation on your list, when a = 0.

V(av) = 1/2( V(initial) + V)
This is good for constant acceleration. Note that it's related to the third equation on your list, which is just distance = average velocity X time.

These equations are used for objects moving in a linear motion at constant acceleration correct?
The first has acceleration = 0, but the second one is very useful.

my book says that I will most likely use the following equations...


but why are the two above equation not important?
They are already included, as I note above.