Using Mathematical Induction to Prove a Summation Formula

ineedhelpnow
Messages
649
Reaction score
0
$S_k:5\cdot 6 +5\cdot 6^2+5\cdot 6^3+ ...+5\cdot 6^k=6(6^k-1)$$S_k:5\cdot 6 +5\cdot 6^2+5\cdot 6^3+ ...+5\cdot 6^k+ 5\cdot 6^{k+1}=6(6^k-1)+5\cdot 6^{k+1}$

what do i do now? to prove $S_{k+1}$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The second statement should be labeled as $S_{k+1}$ and you want the right side to be:

$$6\left(6^{k+1}-1\right)$$

Can you get from what you have to there algebraically?

By the way, I am going to move this thread to the Pre-Calculus subforum and retitle it to remove the abbreviation.
 
i don't know how to get there
 
here's all I've done so far:

RHS
$6^{k+1}-6+5\cdot 6^{k+1}$
 
ineedhelpnow said:
here's all I've done so far:

RHS
$6^{k+1}-6+5\cdot 6^{k+1}$

Okay, combine like terms and then factor...
 
$6^{k+1}-6+5\cdot 6^{k+1}$

$[6^{k+1}+5\cdot 6^{k+1}-6$

$[6^{k+1}(1+5)]-6$

$6[6^k(6)-1]$

$6(6^{k+1}-1)$
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top