Vacuum Solutions: Are They Always Divergence Free?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter quasar_4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vacuum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Vacuum solutions to the Einstein field equations are not always divergence free, despite the stress-energy tensor being the zero tensor in these cases. Verification of vacuum solutions requires checking if the Einstein tensor is zero, which is a necessary condition for validity. The discussion highlights the complexity of solving Einstein's equations with specific matter configurations and boundary conditions, emphasizing that while finding solutions is straightforward, ensuring their validity under specific conditions is significantly more challenging.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein field equations
  • Familiarity with stress-energy tensors
  • Knowledge of divergence-free conditions in tensor calculus
  • Basic concepts of initial and boundary conditions in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of the Einstein tensor in vacuum solutions
  • Explore the role of initial and boundary conditions in general relativity
  • Investigate specific examples of vacuum solutions and their conditions
  • Learn about the relationship between stress-energy tensors and matter configurations
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in differential geometry, and students of general relativity seeking to deepen their understanding of vacuum solutions and their complexities.

quasar_4
Messages
273
Reaction score
0
Are vacuum solutions to the Einstein field equations always divergence free? How would one test this assumption?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actually, let me rephrase this question (it doesn't make much sense). If I understand correctly, the stress-energy tensor for the vacuum case is always the zero tensor. Since the Einstein equation is also divergence free, how does one verify the validity of vacuum solutions? It seems that for dust solutions, there's the option to test whether the divergence of the stress-energy tensor is zero. I am wondering if there's anything analogous in the vacuum case.
 
I've wondered the same thing. If the Einstein tensor is identically divergenceless then every space-time that allows the tensor to be calculated is a candidate for a valid solution. If the result is not zero, then what's to stop me from calling it the SET and claiming I have a solution ?

There must be other conditions to be satisfied, as you suggest. This surely is covered in standard texts but I don't remember seeing it.
 
What Mentz114 said is true. It's not hard to find solutions to Einstein's equations. But then you have some random stress energy tensor. What's much harder is to solve it for a specific matter configuration, with specific initial/boundary conditions and specific symmetries.

Similarly, I can write down almost any A_\mu and claim that I have a solution to Maxwell's equations. I would then have to infer where the sources are.
 
quasar_4 said:
actually, let me rephrase this question (it doesn't make much sense). If I understand correctly, the stress-energy tensor for the vacuum case is always the zero tensor. Since the Einstein equation is also divergence free, how does one verify the validity of vacuum solutions? It seems that for dust solutions, there's the option to test whether the divergence of the stress-energy tensor is zero. I am wondering if there's anything analogous in the vacuum case.

You simply have to check if Einstein's tensor is zero, no?:confused:
 
it sounds right to me (what on Earth else could there be?). But I was afraid it was too good to be true... lol...

I suppose once you begin talking about initial and boundary conditions then things get much harder much faster. And I know some vacuum solutions only work with specific side conditions as well.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K