Vector by bivector geometric product

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the geometric product involving vectors and bivectors, specifically the equation a . B = 1/2(aB - Ba), where 'a' is a vector and 'B' is a bivector. The confusion arises from the need to redefine the geometric product as a combination of a symmetric inner product and an antisymmetric wedge product. The geometric product of an r-blade with an s-blade results in multivectors of varying grades, and the preservation of antisymmetry in the wedge product is crucial for accurate calculations. The participant emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometric product's complexity beyond a simple sum of products.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric algebra concepts
  • Familiarity with bivectors and multivectors
  • Knowledge of the wedge product and its properties
  • Basic grasp of vector calculus and linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of geometric products in geometric algebra
  • Learn about the relationship between vectors and bivectors in geometric contexts
  • Explore the implications of antisymmetry in wedge products
  • Investigate the role of multivectors in higher-dimensional spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students of geometric algebra seeking to deepen their understanding of vector and bivector interactions, particularly in advanced mathematical frameworks.

krcmd1
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
I am trying to teach myself and often get stuck.

Right now I've come across a . B = 1/2(aB-Ba) where a is a vector and B is a bivector.

what's confusing me is that it seems to require a change in the definition of geometric product as the sum of a symmetrical inner product and antisymmetrical wedge product, which implies that a . b = 1/2(ab + Ba).

What have I misunderstood?

Thanks

Ken
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An r-blade Ar can be factored into a product of anticommuting
vectors a1,...,ar. The geometric product of an
r-blade with an s-blade produces a set of multivectors having grades
ranging from |r-s| to r+s and differing from each other by some
multiple of 2. The multivector with the lowest grade is called
Ar . As and the multivector with the highest
grade is the wedge product. The geometric product of a vector (r=1)
with an r-vector must therefore produce a dot product of grade r-1 and
a wedge product of grade r+1. In the case of the product of a vector, a,
and a bivector bc, the result will be a vector and a trivector. Now the
trivector is the outer product of the anti-symmetric bivector with a
vector and can always be written as the wedge product of the three vectors,
a, b, c (You can always find two vectors b and c so that the bivector can
be written as a wedge product.) Now exchange a with bc:
a wedge b wedge c = -b wedge a wedge c = b wedge c wedge a. i.e. in order
that the exchange of any two neighbouring vectors be antisymmetric, the
exchange of the vector a with the bivector bc must be symmetric, so the
sign must be +:

a wedge B = 1/2(aB + Ba)

Exchanging a and B on the rhs leaves the wedge product invariant, as we
want. Now we said above that aB = a dot B + a wedge B, so we can
substitute the above expression for a wedge B and solve for a dot B:

a dot B = 1/2(aB - Ba).

So where is the misunderstanding? Good question! I think you must be
clear about the geometric product being more than just a sum of
a dot product and wedge product. For two bivectors,

[tex]AB = A \cdot B + A\times B + A\wedge B,[/tex]

where the middle term is the commutator product (not the Gibbs cross
product). Further, it is the antisymmetric nature of the wedge product
of blades that must be maintained, so the sign that appears in the
geometric product definition of a vector with an r-blade will be
+ if the r-blade is even and - if the r-blade is odd, but in all cases,
the outer product of the vector with the blade must be antisymmetric
because that is part of the definition of a blade. I hope this long-winded
explanation is of some help.
 
Last edited:
thank you very much. The part I didn't see was that in order to preserve the antisymmetrical nature of the wedge product the sign of reversing aB depends upon the grade of B.

I think the text I'm using may not be clear enough for me.

thanks again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K