Vector identity involving grad and a function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a vector identity involving the gradient operator and a function, specifically using index notation to demonstrate its validity. The context includes the original poster's struggle with understanding the notation and the specific properties of scalar versus vector functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to begin the problem, particularly regarding the use of index notation and the Levi-Civita identities. They question the nature of the function involved and seek clarification on the operations related to the gradient.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide clarifications regarding the nature of the function as a scalar and suggest using the components of the gradient in index notation. There is acknowledgment of the original poster's confusion about notation and the need for foundational understanding.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions difficulty in finding resources or identities that resemble their question, indicating a potential gap in their understanding of the topic. They also note a lack of familiarity with the gradient operator.

ck99
Messages
56
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The question is to use index notation to show that the following is true, where a is a three-vector and f is some function.

Homework Equations



vector_thing.jpg


The Attempt at a Solution



Hmmmm . . . I haven't really got anything to put here!

I am starting to get to grips with the basics of index notation, and using the Levi-Civitas identities for other identity proofs. I haven't ever worked with grad before though, and I can't find any help online because I can't find any other identities that look like this one. Does it have a name or something to help me search?

The closest I have found is "The product of a vector and a scalar" on wikipedia

scalar_and_vector.jpg


but my question states that f is a function, not a scalar, which must make some difference I guess! I just don't know where to start here, do any of the operations within my question have an index-notation version using the LC tensor or similar?

Any help much appreciated :)


PS: You will need to click the thumbnails in the post to see the full pictures of the equations. I am not much of a computer guy. Or a maths guy, it seems :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
f is a scalar function, as opposed to, say, a vector function.

The i-th component of [itex]\nabla f[/itex] is [itex]\partial_i[/itex]f. Use that and the Levi-Civita symbol to prove the identity.
 
vela said:
f is a scalar function, as opposed to, say, a vector function.

The i-th component of [itex]\nabla f[/itex] is [itex]\partial_i[/itex]f. Use that and the Levi-Civita symbol to prove the identity.

I think the root of my problem here is that I have no idea how to write out the starting equation in ordinary longhand notation (as components of vectors), let alone in index notation.

Is [itex]\nabla f[/itex] equal to [itex]f \nabla[/itex]?

And what do I get from multiplying [itex]\nabla[/itex] with fa?
 
If you don't understand the notation or what the gradient is, a good place to start is looking up what it means.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gradient

Your textbooks will probably have a more accessible discussion.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K