MHB Vector of I.I.D. RVs: Expectation Properties Explored

  • Thread starter Thread starter OhMyMarkov
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vector
AI Thread Summary
For a vector of i.i.d. normal random variables with zero mean and standard deviation σ, the expectation properties are clarified. It is established that E[||v||^2] equals nσ^2, where n is the number of variables in the vector. Additionally, the expectation of the sum of the variables, E[∑i v_i], is confirmed to be 0. These properties highlight the behavior of i.i.d. normal random variables in terms of their expected values. Understanding these expectations is crucial for statistical analysis involving such random variables.
OhMyMarkov
Messages
81
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone! :D

Suppose $v$ is a vector of i.i.d. normal RV's with zero mean and standard deviation $\sigma$. Is the following true:

(1) $E[||v||^2]=\sigma ^2$
(2) $E[\sum _i v_i] = 0$

Thank you for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OhMyMarkov said:
Hello everyone! :D

Suppose $v$ is a vector of i.i.d. normal RV's with zero mean and standard deviation $\sigma$. Is the following true:

(1) $E[||v||^2]=\sigma ^2$
(2) $E[\sum _i v_i] = 0$

Thank you for your help!

\[E\left(||v||^2\right)=E\left(\sum_i v_i^2 \right)=\sum_i E(v_i^2)=n\sigma^2\]

Now do the same process of using the expectation of a sum is the sum of the expectations on the second.

CB
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top