Very simple Accelerated motions

  • Thread starter Thread starter dman5505
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves two objects in free fall, where one is released from rest at the top of a building and the second is dropped after a time delay. The objective is to determine the time at which the vertical separation between the two objects equals a specified distance L, while ignoring air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to use kinematic equations to express the distance L in terms of time and acceleration due to gravity. They question how to account for the time difference between the two objects. Some participants suggest starting with separate position equations for each object and then finding the separation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different approaches to the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the formulation of position equations, but there is no explicit consensus on the best method to solve the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the representation of time for the two objects, particularly how to incorporate the time delay t_0 for the second object. The original poster also expresses uncertainty about the sign of L in their equation.

dman5505
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



At t=0 an object is released from rest at the top of a tall building. At the time t_0 a second object is dropped from the same point. Ignoring air resistance, show that the time at which the objects have a vertical separation L is given by: t=L/(gt_0 )+t_0/2.

Homework Equations



L=v_0*t + (1/2)at^2

The Attempt at a Solution



With much fidgeting with the above equation, I decided that the distance must be equal to L=(1/2)gt^2-(1/2)g(t_0+t)^2. However when I simplified the equation, L=-L/(gt_0)-t_0/2 which is the equation I supposed to get multiplied by -1. Since the object is going down, maybe L is supposed to be -L?

More importantly, I was confused on how to represent the change in time for the second object and the first object.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, dman.
I don't think your expression L=v_0*t + (1/2)at^2 can be correct because it doesn't include a variable t_0, which clearly affects L.
Why not start with an expression for the position of the first object as a function of time?
Then an expression for the position of the second. It will probably have a t - t_0 in it.
Finally, subtract the two to get L.
 
Hi, I have the same problem, did you manage to solve it?
 
Yes, it works out well. Show your work if you would like help with it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
997
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K