Vanadium 50 said:
Is this part of your EEG/Monopole Detector idea? If so, it's better to tell us what you're trying to do rather than dropping bits and pieces like breadcrubs.
I don't know how to explain it to you. But I'll try. You are giving me the choice of either not explaining everything and not getting replies or explaining it and possibly getting the thread locked. I'll take risk in explaining because maybe some of you can comprehend this.
To start. The Big Bang is complex. Although some want to make it simple by rigid Newtonian residual elemental thinking.
For example. Before symmetry breaking when the electroweak force was still one at high temperature (which we have duplicated at the particle accelerators). Does the force anticipate that at some point we would use laptop and internet using electrical and electromagnetic signal. Yes. Big Bang is smart and not just some random explosion of spacetime and matter.
Could Big Bang be all about temperature? Electroweak may use it. But for the missing monopoles problem. Big Bang could hide it in the hidden sector or dark matter. And it may not only be by high temperature that it existed, but by some other means.
Look. The universe shared with us the supernal life, hence we share with it the supernal power.
What I'm trying to do is to summon the monopoles from the dark sector by creating vacuum domain in my table. Or to give you direct idea, low temperature symmetry breaking. The ability to have consciousness may be a fundamental aspect of the universe, right there at the Big Bang, we can refer to it as fundamental. Some physicists believe it like for example in the debate whether consciousness can collapse wave function and countless others.
Heck. I just heard the above from a physicist. So just want to build monopole detector to duplicate the experiment and see if I could also detect the monopoles like he did. Most physicists don't believe in low temperature symmetry breaking of some kind, so totally ignore doing any experiment of that nature. What if consistent monopoles can be produced this way instead of that rare 1982 valentine monopole detected by the 8 loop superconducting detector (the space it is housed in may have temporary symmetry breaking as a result of residual leak from another location, that's why it got a 5 sigma monopole event.
Realize guys that the Big Bang is more complex than all the theories we have. Remember the James Webb telescope has revealed that galaxies are more like fully formed right after the Big Bang and didn't evolve from current model.
Also you will notice that Dark Matter dynamics is not consistent, some cosmic object having the behavior of dark matter, some more like modified gravity. This may be because of another dynamics at play such as a modified vacuum or conditioned space. What I mean is the universe is more complicated than you can possibly imagine.
I hope the above descriptions get you in the mood now for my particular project.
Come on. If I can't detect monopoles, then no problem. At least I tried. In high school physics lab, they have dynamos and electromagnetic. Trying them out is part of learning. So trying out a monopole detector is part of learning too.
Hutchphd. Are there no voltmeter that is like oscilloscope in which it can sample it many times a second? What is gain of a normal voltmeter? I just want to know if my Brainmaster 2E is already outdated in terms of amplifier gain and instead of buying old 486, i'll just get oscilloscope that is sensitive enough to track monopoles that has frequency components too. (Before this thread is locked again, please give me some technical info about this. Thank you).
