A Visualizing Arbitrary Coordinate System - Example Needed

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the distinction between the accelerations of components and the overall acceleration in a plane polar coordinate system. The user seeks clarification on how the components' accelerations can differ from the total acceleration, specifically questioning the values of r-double-dot and zero. The provided equations illustrate that while the radial component has an acceleration of r-double-dot, the angular component's acceleration is influenced by both the velocity and angular acceleration. This confusion stems from a long gap in the user's study of classical mechanics. A clear example is requested to enhance understanding of these concepts.
BLevine1985
Messages
7
Reaction score
2
Hi I'm wondering if someone can illustrate with an example what I bracketed in blue? I'm having a hard time visualizing how it is that the accelerations of the components are NOT necessarily equal to the components of the acceleration...Much appreciated!
relative acceleration of geodesic in 3+ dimensions.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In plane polars, the position vector is r\mathbf{e}_r(\theta) = r(\cos \theta, \sin \theta). The accelerations of the components are therefore \ddot r and zero. However, the acceleration is <br /> \ddot{\mathbf{r}} = \ddot r\mathbf{e}_r + 2\dot r \dot \theta \mathbf{e}_\theta + r(-\dot \theta^2 \mathbf{e}_r + \ddot \theta \mathbf{e}_\theta) = (\ddot r - r\dot \theta^2)\mathbf{e}_r + (2\dot r \dot \theta + r\ddot \theta)\mathbf{e}_\theta.
 
How did you get the acceleration of the components as r-double-dot and zero?

I understand how you got the general acceleration of r-double dot but not the first part. Sorry it's been like 10 years since I took classical mechanics...
 
Moderator's note: Spin-off from another thread due to topic change. In the second link referenced, there is a claim about a physical interpretation of frame field. Consider a family of observers whose worldlines fill a region of spacetime. Each of them carries a clock and a set of mutually orthogonal rulers. Each observer points in the (timelike) direction defined by its worldline's tangent at any given event along it. What about the rulers each of them carries ? My interpretation: each...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
921
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K