Visualizing Protons: Beyond the Spherical Picture

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobsmith76
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proton
Click For Summary
Textbook representations of protons as spheres may be misleading, as they imply a solid structure, while protons are actually composed of three quarks arranged with zero orbital angular momentum, resulting in spherical symmetry. The spherical shape reflects the probability distribution of finding quarks, which is defined by a wavefunction dependent on radial distance from the proton's center. This charge radius gives a natural spherical representation, but it should not be interpreted as a hard casing. Instead, the proton's physical extent is infinite, with the likelihood of locating a quark decreasing exponentially outside the charge radius. Ultimately, while the spherical model is a useful schematic, it simplifies the complex quantum nature of protons.
bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
In every textbook there are pictures of protons with spheres. This implies that there is some hard case and that that hard case is made of something. is this picture misleading? protons are made of quarks but i think only three of them. if quarks are not spherical with a casing then what is the best way to visualize a proton? do we simply not know?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bobsmith76 said:
In every textbook there are pictures of protons with spheres. This implies that there is some hard case and that that hard case is made of something. is this picture misleading? protons are made of quarks but i think only three of them. if quarks are not spherical with a casing then what is the best way to visualize a proton? do we simply not know?

The relevant physics is the following. First is that the configuration of uud quarks in the proton has zero orbital angular momentum. Therefore it is spherically symmetric and the probability of finding an individual component is described by a wavefunction that only depends on the radial distance from the center of the proton. The expectation value of the radial distance in this wavefunction (the most likely place to measure a quark) is closely related to what we define as the charge radius of the proton.

Now the natural picture that emerges is the sphere that you describe. The spherical symmetry above explains why it is a sphere and the radius of the sphere is essentially the charge radius. However, this is not a hard case, any more than a spherical picture of a hydrogen atom is a hard case. It is just a schematic picture of the symmetry of the proton along with the most likely place to find one of its quarks. The physical extent of a photon is actually infinite, but the probability to find a quark outside the charge radius falls off exponentially. There's no great way to draw this in 3D other than the "cloud" type pictures familiar from hydrogen, so we're usually left with the sphere illustration and a bit more detail that follows from quantum mechanics, but isn't obvious to the casual observer.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
410
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K