Want this job? React fast? Taking down smoke stack.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Spinnor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job Smoke
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the method of weakening a smoke stack for demolition, as demonstrated in a BBC video clip. This technique is preferred over explosives due to its cost-effectiveness, ease of cleanup, and predictability in the stack's fall direction, minimizing risks to nearby structures. The conversation draws parallels to traditional tree felling, emphasizing that while both methods can be dangerous, proper execution mitigates risks significantly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of structural engineering principles
  • Knowledge of demolition techniques
  • Familiarity with safety protocols in construction
  • Experience with risk assessment in hazardous environments
NEXT STEPS
  • Research controlled demolition techniques
  • Learn about structural integrity assessments
  • Explore safety measures in construction and demolition
  • Investigate the environmental impact of demolition methods
USEFUL FOR

Construction engineers, demolition contractors, safety officers, and anyone involved in large-scale structural dismantling projects will benefit from this discussion.

Spinnor
Gold Member
Messages
2,231
Reaction score
419
BBC had video clip of a worker presumably weakening a tall smoke stack. Looks somewhat dangerous. See,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PaR4cjqJ3Is#t=21

Why weaken it? Why not just use explosives?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ease of cleanup (as it falls in a nice line, instead of a giant pile) and predictability in how it will fall (so it doesn't crush nearby buildings/walls/etc. Plus it's cheaper than designing and executing a controlled explosion.
 
Spinnor said:
Looks somewhat dangerous.

People have been cutting down big trees that that was for thousands of years. It's only dangerous if you do it wrong ...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JteV8r8YnN0
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 236 ·
8
Replies
236
Views
17K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K