War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the role of intense warfare in the evolution of complex societies in the Old World, as presented by Peter Turchin and colleagues. Their model utilizes cultural evolution mechanisms to predict the emergence of large-scale societies across the Afroeurasian landmass, demonstrating a strong correlation between historical statehood and political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita. Key historical factors influencing societal development include technological advancements like the chariot and iron smelting, as well as catastrophic events such as plagues and migrations that reshaped political landscapes. The findings underscore the necessity of adaptability in societal structures to achieve peace and prosperity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of cultural evolution mechanisms
  • Familiarity with historical technological advancements, specifically the chariot and iron smelting
  • Knowledge of historical plagues and their societal impacts
  • Insight into migration patterns and their effects on political systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the impact of the chariot on Middle Eastern societies around 1500 BC
  • Explore the effects of the Black Death on European political structures in 1350 AD
  • Study the cultural evolution mechanisms that predict societal complexity
  • Investigate the role of technological change in the development of warfare strategies
USEFUL FOR

Historians, sociologists, political scientists, and anyone interested in the dynamics of societal evolution and the impact of warfare on complex societies.

jim mcnamara
Mentor
Messages
4,789
Reaction score
3,852
http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2013/09/20/1308825110
War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies
Peter Turchina, Thomas E. Currieb, Edward A. L. Turnerc, and Sergey Gavrilets

Intense warfare as an explanatory model for driving the development of stable complex societies.

Significance

How did human societies evolve from small groups, integrated by face-to-face cooperation, to huge anonymous societies of today? Why is there so much variation in the ability of different human populations to construct viable states? We developed a model that uses cultural evolution mechanisms to predict where and when the largest-scale complex societies should have arisen in human history. The model was simulated within a realistic landscape of the Afroeurasian landmass, and its predictions were tested against real data. Overall, the model did an excellent job predicting empirical patterns. Our results suggest a possible explanation as to why a long history of statehood is positively correlated with political stability, institutional quality, and income per capita.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
What is wanted is peace and prosperity; complex societies are one way of obtaining that desired result.

Unfortunately, as history has shown repeatedly, there are other ingredients including technological change, plague, and distant events.

Technology: the taming of the horse and the invention of the chariot destabilized the middle east ~1500 BC.
the mastery of iron smelting ended the late bronze age ~1200 BC

Plague: the Byzantine empire was ravaged by plague during the reign of Justinian, ~550 AD.
the Black Death weakened all of the kingdoms of Europe ~1350 AD, leading to wars all over.

Distant events: troubles in the far east lead to the migration of the Goths from the Ukraine to the Roman borders, soon followed by the Huns. This lead to major changes in all of the "complex systems" of ~400 AD
Religious innovations from the Arabian peninsula, combined with lingering political and social issues lead to the destruction of the Byzantine possessions in the middle east and north Africa, and the complete destruction of the Persian empire.When it is shown that the old ways no longer work, innovators try new things ... thus trench warfare was used in WW I, but only fox holes were used in WW II: mobility was valued over stationary, defensive lines as attack was shown to be the decisive tactic ... as long as you could sustain the attack, and hold the ground behind your lines.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K